-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 63
LCORE-988: Regenerated configuration docs #887
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
LCORE-988: Regenerated configuration docs #887
Conversation
WalkthroughDocumentation for configuration schema updated across three formats to introduce a new Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
docs/config.html (2)
179-196: Consider adding a description for theapi_keyfield.The
api_keyfield inAPIKeyTokenConfigurationlacks a description, which may leave users uncertain about its purpose, format, or usage. Since this is regenerated documentation, consider enhancing the source code docstring to provide context.
261-264: Missing type annotation forapi_key_configfield.The table entry for
api_key_confighas empty Type and Description cells. Based on the PlantUML diagram, this should referenceAPIKeyTokenConfiguration. Consider updating the documentation generator to include type information for better clarity.docs/config.md (2)
10-19: Consider adding a description for theapi_keyfield.The
api_keyfield lacks a description. Adding documentation about its purpose (e.g., "API key for token-based authentication") would improve usability. Update the source docstring so it appears in regenerated docs.
56-56: Missing type information forapi_key_config.The table shows empty Type and Description columns. This should reference
APIKeyTokenConfigurationbased on the PlantUML diagram. Consider improving the documentation generation to include type references.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
docs/config.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngdocs/config.svgis excluded by!**/*.svg
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
docs/config.html(2 hunks)docs/config.md(5 hunks)docs/config.puml(3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (2)
📚 Learning: 2025-11-24T16:58:04.410Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: lightspeed-core/lightspeed-stack PR: 0
File: CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-11-24T16:58:04.410Z
Learning: Applies to src/models/**/*.py : Pydantic configuration classes must extend `ConfigurationBase`; data models must extend `BaseModel`
Applied to files:
docs/config.puml
📚 Learning: 2025-11-24T16:58:04.410Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: lightspeed-core/lightspeed-stack PR: 0
File: CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-11-24T16:58:04.410Z
Learning: Applies to src/models/config.py : All configuration must use Pydantic models extending `ConfigurationBase` with `extra="forbid"` to reject unknown fields
Applied to files:
docs/config.puml
🪛 LanguageTool
docs/config.md
[style] ~315-~315: Consider using “inaccessible” to avoid wordiness.
Context: ...figured in the llama-stack run.yaml are not accessible to lightspeed-core agents. Useful reso...
(NOT_ABLE_PREMIUM)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (6)
- GitHub Check: build-pr
- GitHub Check: Konflux kflux-prd-rh02 / lightspeed-stack-on-pull-request
- GitHub Check: E2E: library mode / ci
- GitHub Check: E2E: library mode / azure
- GitHub Check: E2E: server mode / ci
- GitHub Check: E2E: server mode / azure
🔇 Additional comments (3)
docs/config.puml (3)
3-5: LGTM: New configuration class properly defined.The
APIKeyTokenConfigurationclass is correctly added with itsapi_keyfield.
192-192: LGTM: Inheritance follows codebase conventions.The
APIKeyTokenConfigurationcorrectly extendsConfigurationBase, consistent with other configuration classes. Based on learnings, Pydantic configuration classes must extendConfigurationBase.
13-25: Verify the dual field pattern for API key configuration.The
AuthenticationConfigurationincludes bothapi_key_config: Optional[APIKeyTokenConfiguration]andapi_key_configuration. This mirrors the existing pattern withjwk_config/jwk_configurationandrh_identity_config/rh_identity_configuration, suggesting these may be properties or aliases. Verify that both fields are intentional and properly implemented in the source code.
|
/retest |
Description
LCORE-988: Regenerated configuration docs
Type of change
Tools used to create PR
Identify any AI code assistants used in this PR (for transparency and review context)
Related Tickets & Documents
Summary by CodeRabbit
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.