LCORE-1070: updated comments in test_openapi_json.py

[tisnik]

Description

LCORE-1070: updated comments in test_openapi_json.py

Type of change

• Refactor
• New feature
• Bug fix
• CVE fix
• Optimization
• Documentation Update
• Configuration Update
• Bump-up service version
• Bump-up dependent library
• Bump-up library or tool used for development (does not change the final image)
• CI configuration change
• Konflux configuration change
• Unit tests improvement
• Integration tests improvement
• End to end tests improvement

Tools used to create PR

Identify any AI code assistants used in this PR (for transparency and review context)

• Assisted-by: CodeRabbitAI
• Generated by: N/A

Related Tickets & Documents

• Related Issue #LCORE-1070

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Tests
  • Enhanced documentation for test utilities with improved docstrings for better clarity on test assertions and expected behaviors.

_{✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.}

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@tisnik has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 12 minutes and 14 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between af4678b and 8a834fc.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• tests/integration/test_openapi_json.py (1 hunks)

Walkthrough

A detailed docstring is added to the _check_paths_and_responses_exist test helper function in the test_openapi_json.py file, documenting its purpose, parameters, and potential assertion errors. No functional changes are made.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Test documentation tests/integration/test_openapi_json.py	Added comprehensive docstring to _check_paths_and_responses_exist function describing its purpose, parameters, and assertion behavior

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• LCORE-628: Elementary OpenAPI integration tests #481: Documents the same _check_paths_and_responses_exist test helper function that was originally added in this PR.
• LCORE-628: OpenAPI integration tests #743: Related docstring documentation for the same test helper function in OpenAPI JSON tests.

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title accurately describes the main change: adding/updating comments (specifically a docstring) in the test_openapi_json.py file as indicated by the PR objectives and code summary.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	Docstring coverage is 100.00% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

tests/integration/test_openapi_json.py (1)

87-89: Consider using dict[str, Any] for consistency.

The spec parameter is typed as dict, while other similar functions in the file (e.g., _check_openapi_top_level_info on line 65, _check_server_section_present on line 81) use dict[str, Any]. Using the more specific type hint would improve consistency across the codebase.

Apply this diff to align the type hint:

 def _check_paths_and_responses_exist(
-    spec: dict, path: str, method: str, expected_codes: set[str]
+    spec: dict[str, Any], path: str, method: str, expected_codes: set[str]
 ) -> None:

📜 Review details

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between dcb4637 and af4678b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• tests/integration/test_openapi_json.py (1 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

📓 Path-based instructions (2)

tests/{unit,integration}/**/*.py

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (CLAUDE.md)

tests/{unit,integration}/**/*.py: Use pytest for all unit and integration tests; do not use unittest framework
Unit tests must achieve 60% code coverage; integration tests must achieve 10% coverage

Files:

• tests/integration/test_openapi_json.py

tests/**/*.py

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (CLAUDE.md)

Use pytest-mock with AsyncMock objects for mocking in tests

Files:

• tests/integration/test_openapi_json.py

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (6)

• GitHub Check: build-pr
• GitHub Check: Konflux kflux-prd-rh02 / lightspeed-stack-on-pull-request
• GitHub Check: E2E: library mode / ci
• GitHub Check: E2E: server mode / azure
• GitHub Check: E2E: library mode / azure
• GitHub Check: E2E: server mode / ci

🔇 Additional comments (1)

tests/integration/test_openapi_json.py (1)

90-100: Excellent documentation addition!

The docstring clearly documents the function's purpose, parameters, and potential exceptions. This significantly improves code maintainability and helps future developers understand the validation logic.