Skip to content

Conversation

@pyup-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR updates packaging from 20.4 to 20.8.

Changelog

20.8

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

* Revert back to setuptools for compatibility purposes for some Linux distros (:issue:`363`)
* Do not insert an underscore in wheel tags when the interpreter version number
is more than 2 digits (:issue:`372`)

20.7

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

No unreleased changes.

20.6

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

.. note:: This release was subsequently yanked, and these changes were included in 20.7.

* Fix flit configuration, to include LICENSE files (:issue:`357`)
* Make `intel` a recognized CPU architecture for the `universal` macOS platform tag (:issue:`361`)
* Add some missing type hints to `packaging.requirements` (issue:`350`)

20.5

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

* Officially support Python 3.9 (:issue:`343`)
* Deprecate the ``LegacyVersion`` and ``LegacySpecifier`` classes (:issue:`321`)
* Handle ``OSError`` on non-dynamic executables when attempting to resolve
the glibc version string.
Links

@pyup-bot pyup-bot mentioned this pull request Dec 12, 2020
@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #39 (b07f2c0) into master (4a4a665) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master       #39   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           12        12           
  Lines          116       116           
=========================================
  Hits           116       116           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 4a4a665...b07f2c0. Read the comment docs.

@pyup-bot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Closing this in favor of #58

@pyup-bot pyup-bot closed this Jan 30, 2021
@leoschuch leoschuch deleted the pyup-update-packaging-20.4-to-20.8 branch January 30, 2021 22:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants