Command to get theorem type#101
Draft
sorgfresser wants to merge 24 commits intoleanprover-community:masterfrom
Draft
Command to get theorem type#101sorgfresser wants to merge 24 commits intoleanprover-community:masterfrom
sorgfresser wants to merge 24 commits intoleanprover-community:masterfrom
Conversation
Contributor
|
This is an interesting feature in my opinion. REPL has extraction capabilities centered around tactics, and I believe that adding some for declarations could be nice. #96 is related to this in that sense. |
Contributor
Author
|
@augustepoiroux thanks for the feedback! I moved this to a flag |
…from allTactics and rootGoals)
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Added a new command that retrieves the corresponding type for a definition.
Given that the approach of separate lemmas is becoming more popular, this might be interesting to have.
Consider the following:
which is the current approach, for example used in DeepSeekProver v2.
This is inherently redundant. Importantly, the proof of A, B is not necessary in C.
Instead, one can now write
and compose via