build(deps): bump pip from 23.2.1 to 23.3 in /drivers/gpu/drm/ci/xfails#1
Open
dependabot[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
Open
build(deps): bump pip from 23.2.1 to 23.3 in /drivers/gpu/drm/ci/xfails#1dependabot[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
dependabot[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
Conversation
Bumps [pip](https://github.com/pypa/pip) from 23.2.1 to 23.3. - [Changelog](https://github.com/pypa/pip/blob/main/NEWS.rst) - [Commits](pypa/pip@23.2.1...23.3) --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: pip dependency-type: direct:production ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
dependabot
bot
added
the
dependencies
l3nkz
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 2, 2025
The CPU state tracking and synchronization mechanism in smpboot.c is
completely independent of the hotplug code and all logic around it is
implemented in architecture specific code.
Except for the state reporting of the AP there is absolutely nothing
architecture specific and the sychronization and decision functions can be
moved into the generic hotplug core code.
Provide an integrated variant and add the core synchronization and decision
points. This comes in two flavours:
1) DEAD state synchronization
Updated by the architecture code once the AP reaches the point where
it is ready to be torn down by the control CPU, e.g. by removing power
or clocks or tear down via the hypervisor.
The control CPU waits for this state to be reached with a timeout. If
the state is reached an architecture specific cleanup function is
invoked.
2) Full state synchronization
This extends #1 with AP alive synchronization. This is new
functionality, which allows to replace architecture specific wait
mechanims, e.g. cpumasks, completely.
It also prevents that an AP which is in a limbo state can be brought
up again. This can happen when an AP failed to report dead state
during a previous off-line operation.
The dead synchronization is what most architectures use. Only x86 makes a
bringup decision based on that state at the moment.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>
Tested-by: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@natalenko.name>
Tested-by: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> # parisc
Tested-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli <gpiccoli@igalia.com> # Steam Deck
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230512205256.476305035@linutronix.de
l3nkz
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 2, 2025
The bring up logic of a to be onlined CPU consists of several parts, which
are considered to be a single hotplug state:
1) Control CPU issues the wake-up
2) To be onlined CPU starts up, does the minimal initialization,
reports to be alive and waits for release into the complete bring-up.
3) Control CPU waits for the alive report and releases the upcoming CPU
for the complete bring-up.
Allow to split this into two states:
1) Control CPU issues the wake-up
After that the to be onlined CPU starts up, does the minimal
initialization, reports to be alive and waits for release into the
full bring-up. As this can run after the control CPU dropped the
hotplug locks the code which is executed on the AP before it reports
alive has to be carefully audited to not violate any of the hotplug
constraints, especially not modifying any of the various cpumasks.
This is really only meant to avoid waiting for the AP to react on the
wake-up. Of course an architecture can move strict CPU related setup
functionality, e.g. microcode loading, with care before the
synchronization point to save further pointless waiting time.
2) Control CPU waits for the alive report and releases the upcoming CPU
for the complete bring-up.
This allows that the two states can be split up to run all to be onlined
CPUs up to state #1 on the control CPU and then at a later point run state
#2. This spares some of the latencies of the full serialized per CPU
bringup by avoiding the per CPU wakeup/wait serialization. The assumption
is that the first AP already waits when the last AP has been woken up. This
obvioulsy depends on the hardware latencies and depending on the timings
this might still not completely eliminate all wait scenarios.
This split is just a preparatory step for enabling the parallel bringup
later. The boot time bringup is still fully serialized. It has a separate
config switch so that architectures which want to support parallel bringup
can test the split of the CPUHP_BRINGUG step separately.
To enable this the architecture must support the CPU hotplug core sync
mechanism and has to be audited that there are no implicit hotplug state
dependencies which require a fully serialized bringup.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>
Tested-by: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@natalenko.name>
Tested-by: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> # parisc
Tested-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli <gpiccoli@igalia.com> # Steam Deck
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230512205257.080801387@linutronix.de
l3nkz
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 2, 2025
This implements a new interface to lockdep, lock_set_cmp_fn(), for
defining a custom ordering when taking multiple locks of the same
class.
This is an alternative to subclasses, but can not fully replace them
since subclasses allow lock hierarchies with other clasees
inter-twined, while this relies on pure class nesting.
Specifically, if A is our nesting class then:
A/0 <- B <- A/1
Would be a valid lock order with subclasses (each subclass really is a
full class from the validation PoV) but not with this annotation,
which requires all nesting to be consecutive.
Example output:
| ============================================
| WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
| 6.2.0-rc8-00003-g7d81e591ca6a-dirty #15 Not tainted
| --------------------------------------------
| kworker/14:3/938 is trying to acquire lock:
| ffff8880143218c8 (&b->lock l=0 0:2803368){++++}-{3:3}, at: bch_btree_node_get.part.0+0x81/0x2b0
|
| but task is already holding lock:
| ffff8880143de8c8 (&b->lock l=1 1048575:9223372036854775807){++++}-{3:3}, at: __bch_btree_map_nodes+0xea/0x1e0
| and the lock comparison function returns 1:
|
| other info that might help us debug this:
| Possible unsafe locking scenario:
|
| CPU0
| ----
| lock(&b->lock l=1 1048575:9223372036854775807);
| lock(&b->lock l=0 0:2803368);
|
| *** DEADLOCK ***
|
| May be due to missing lock nesting notation
|
| 3 locks held by kworker/14:3/938:
| #0: ffff888005ea9d38 ((wq_completion)bcache){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1ec/0x530
| #1: ffff8880098c3e70 ((work_completion)(&cl->work)#3){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1ec/0x530
| #2: ffff8880143de8c8 (&b->lock l=1 1048575:9223372036854775807){++++}-{3:3}, at: __bch_btree_map_nodes+0xea/0x1e0
[peterz: extended changelog]
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230509195847.1745548-1-kent.overstreet@linux.dev
l3nkz
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 2, 2025
We've run into the case that the balancer tries to balance a migration disabled task and trigger the warning in set_task_cpu() like below: ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 0 at kernel/sched/core.c:3115 set_task_cpu+0x188/0x240 Modules linked in: hclgevf xt_CHECKSUM ipt_REJECT nf_reject_ipv4 <...snip> CPU: 7 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/7 Kdump: loaded Tainted: G O 6.1.0-rc4+ #1 Hardware name: Huawei TaiShan 2280 V2/BC82AMDC, BIOS 2280-V2 CS V5.B221.01 12/09/2021 pstate: 604000c9 (nZCv daIF +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) pc : set_task_cpu+0x188/0x240 lr : load_balance+0x5d0/0xc60 sp : ffff80000803bc70 x29: ffff80000803bc70 x28: ffff004089e190e8 x27: ffff004089e19040 x26: ffff007effcabc38 x25: 0000000000000000 x24: 0000000000000001 x23: ffff80000803be84 x22: 000000000000000c x21: ffffb093e79e2a78 x20: 000000000000000c x19: ffff004089e19040 x18: 0000000000000000 x17: 0000000000001fad x16: 0000000000000030 x15: 0000000000000000 x14: 0000000000000003 x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000000 x11: 0000000000000001 x10: 0000000000000400 x9 : ffffb093e4cee530 x8 : 00000000fffffffe x7 : 0000000000ce168a x6 : 000000000000013e x5 : 00000000ffffffe1 x4 : 0000000000000001 x3 : 0000000000000b2a x2 : 0000000000000b2a x1 : ffffb093e6d6c510 x0 : 0000000000000001 Call trace: set_task_cpu+0x188/0x240 load_balance+0x5d0/0xc60 rebalance_domains+0x26c/0x380 _nohz_idle_balance.isra.0+0x1e0/0x370 run_rebalance_domains+0x6c/0x80 __do_softirq+0x128/0x3d8 ____do_softirq+0x18/0x24 call_on_irq_stack+0x2c/0x38 do_softirq_own_stack+0x24/0x3c __irq_exit_rcu+0xcc/0xf4 irq_exit_rcu+0x18/0x24 el1_interrupt+0x4c/0xe4 el1h_64_irq_handler+0x18/0x2c el1h_64_irq+0x74/0x78 arch_cpu_idle+0x18/0x4c default_idle_call+0x58/0x194 do_idle+0x244/0x2b0 cpu_startup_entry+0x30/0x3c secondary_start_kernel+0x14c/0x190 __secondary_switched+0xb0/0xb4 ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- Further investigation shows that the warning is superfluous, the migration disabled task is just going to be migrated to its current running CPU. This is because that on load balance if the dst_cpu is not allowed by the task, we'll re-select a new_dst_cpu as a candidate. If no task can be balanced to dst_cpu we'll try to balance the task to the new_dst_cpu instead. In this case when the migration disabled task is not on CPU it only allows to run on its current CPU, load balance will select its current CPU as new_dst_cpu and later triggers the warning above. The new_dst_cpu is chosen from the env->dst_grpmask. Currently it contains CPUs in sched_group_span() and if we have overlapped groups it's possible to run into this case. This patch makes env->dst_grpmask of group_balance_mask() which exclude any CPUs from the busiest group and solve the issue. For balancing in a domain with no overlapped groups the behaviour keeps same as before. Suggested-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@hisilicon.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230530082507.10444-1-yangyicong@huawei.com
l3nkz
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 2, 2025
UEFI Specification version 2.9 introduces the concept of memory
acceptance. Some Virtual Machine platforms, such as Intel TDX or AMD
SEV-SNP, require memory to be accepted before it can be used by the
guest. Accepting happens via a protocol specific to the Virtual Machine
platform.
There are several ways the kernel can deal with unaccepted memory:
1. Accept all the memory during boot. It is easy to implement and it
doesn't have runtime cost once the system is booted. The downside is
very long boot time.
Accept can be parallelized to multiple CPUs to keep it manageable
(i.e. via DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT), but it tends to saturate
memory bandwidth and does not scale beyond the point.
2. Accept a block of memory on the first use. It requires more
infrastructure and changes in page allocator to make it work, but
it provides good boot time.
On-demand memory accept means latency spikes every time kernel steps
onto a new memory block. The spikes will go away once workload data
set size gets stabilized or all memory gets accepted.
3. Accept all memory in background. Introduce a thread (or multiple)
that gets memory accepted proactively. It will minimize time the
system experience latency spikes on memory allocation while keeping
low boot time.
This approach cannot function on its own. It is an extension of #2:
background memory acceptance requires functional scheduler, but the
page allocator may need to tap into unaccepted memory before that.
The downside of the approach is that these threads also steal CPU
cycles and memory bandwidth from the user's workload and may hurt
user experience.
Implement #1 and #2 for now. #2 is the default. Some workloads may want
to use #1 with accept_memory=eager in kernel command line. #3 can be
implemented later based on user's demands.
Support of unaccepted memory requires a few changes in core-mm code:
- memblock accepts memory on allocation. It serves early boot memory
allocations and doesn't limit them to pre-accepted pool of memory.
- page allocator accepts memory on the first allocation of the page.
When kernel runs out of accepted memory, it accepts memory until the
high watermark is reached. It helps to minimize fragmentation.
EFI code will provide two helpers if the platform supports unaccepted
memory:
- accept_memory() makes a range of physical addresses accepted.
- range_contains_unaccepted_memory() checks anything within the range
of physical addresses requires acceptance.
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Acked-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> # memblock
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230606142637.5171-2-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
l3nkz
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 2, 2025
After commit c5c0ba9 ("percpu: Add {raw,this}_cpu_try_cmpxchg()"), clang built ARCH=arm and ARCH=arm64 kernels with CONFIG_INIT_STACK_NONE started panicking on boot in alloc_vmap_area(): [ 0.000000] kernel BUG at mm/vmalloc.c:1638! [ 0.000000] Internal error: Oops - BUG: 00000000f2000800 [#1] PREEMPT SMP [ 0.000000] Modules linked in: [ 0.000000] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.4.0-rc2-ARCH+ #1 [ 0.000000] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT) [ 0.000000] pstate: 200000c9 (nzCv daIF -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) [ 0.000000] pc : alloc_vmap_area+0x7ec/0x7f8 [ 0.000000] lr : alloc_vmap_area+0x7e8/0x7f8 Compiling mm/vmalloc.c with W=2 reveals an instance of -Wshadow, which helps uncover that through macro expansion, '__old = *(ovalp)' in raw_cpu_generic_try_cmpxchg() can become '__old = *(&__old)' through raw_cpu_generic_cmpxchg(), which results in garbage being assigned to the inner __old and the cmpxchg not working properly. Add an extra underscore to __old in raw_cpu_generic_try_cmpxchg() so that there is no more self-assignment, which resolves the panics. Closes: ClangBuiltLinux/linux#1868 Fixes: c5c0ba9 ("percpu: Add {raw,this}_cpu_try_cmpxchg()") Debugged-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230607-fix-shadowing-in-raw_cpu_generic_try_cmpxchg-v1-1-8f0a3d930d43@kernel.org
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Bumps pip from 23.2.1 to 23.3.
Changelog
Sourced from pip's changelog.
... (truncated)
Commits
e3dc91dBump for release3e85558Update AUTHORS.txt8d02787Reclassify news fragmentf6ecf40Merge pull request #12350 from sbidoul/readact-collecting-url3060865Merge pull request #12335 from edmorley/patch-18f0ed32Redact URLs in Collecting... logsd1659b8Correct issue number for NEWS entry added by #121972333ef3Upgrade urllib3 to 1.26.17 (#12343)496b268Update "Running Tests" documentation (#12334)d1f0981Merge pull request #12331 from sbidoul/update-egg-deprecation-messageDependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting
@dependabot rebase.Dependabot commands and options
You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:
@dependabot rebasewill rebase this PR@dependabot recreatewill recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it@dependabot mergewill merge this PR after your CI passes on it@dependabot squash and mergewill squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it@dependabot cancel mergewill cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging@dependabot reopenwill reopen this PR if it is closed@dependabot closewill close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually@dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditionswill show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency@dependabot ignore this major versionwill close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)@dependabot ignore this minor versionwill close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)@dependabot ignore this dependencywill close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)You can disable automated security fix PRs for this repo from the Security Alerts page.