Customization tips: allow rgrep to search properly for the symbols
#1932
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This commit aims to introduce proper mechanism of seeking for symbol
in `elpy` mode while `elpy-goto-definition` fails at finding given
symbol.
`rgrep` although works properly in cases like:
```
class Dog(Animal):
...
```
but fails at:
```
class Dog:
...
```
where class has no parentheses after its name definition.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
PR Summary
This pull request aims to introduce proper mechanism of seeking for symbol in
elpymode whileelpy-goto-definitionfails at finding given symbol.rgrepalthough works properly in cases like:but fails at:
where class has no parentheses after its name definition.
PR checklist
Please make sure that the following things have been addressed (and check the relevant checkboxes):