Conversation
dylandreimerink
approved these changes
Feb 9, 2026
Collaborator
dylandreimerink
left a comment
dylandreimerink
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Amazing, thanks!
We do indeed have our own spellcheck based on aspell with a bunch of logic around it so it does not try to spellcheck code (variables and types not being proper English words and all). So it does not catch errors in code blocks and generated docs, and apparently also not a few other things.
Good to have another pass with a tool like this once in a while, spellchecking with the swiss cheese model 😁 .
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I ran codespell on the repository, It won't check for grammar and the context though. I was gonna add a
pre-commit-config.yamland add codespell to it but i saw that there is already a spellcheck in the CI.I went over the changes myself, and there's some instances of
re-use -> reuse, not sure if it's objectively wrong.Thanks!