Skip to content

Conversation

@alanking
Copy link
Contributor

As a workaround for #8
In service of irods/irods#7957

This is required to run one of the test suites for metadata_guard. As a plugin, it was able to avoid this by installing PRC in its test hook.

Checked out 1.29.2 which is the last tag for Compose V1.
Part of absorbing the metadata_guard REP is bringing in its test
suite. One of its test suites uses the python-irodsclient. This
change ensures that python-irodsclient pip package is installed
on the containers running the tests so that the test suite can
be run.
@korydraughn korydraughn requested a review from trel March 14, 2025 15:59
Copy link
Contributor

@korydraughn korydraughn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me.

Let's see if @trel has any opinions.

@trel
Copy link
Member

trel commented Mar 14, 2025

just requesting another glance regarding 'docker-compose' vs 'docker compose'. otherwise, good to go.

@alanking
Copy link
Contributor Author

just requesting another glance regarding 'docker-compose' vs 'docker compose'. otherwise, good to go.

The additions here are dealing specifically with the docker-compose Python implementation (i.e. Compose V1), not the Compose plugin for Docker. So docker compose is incorrect.

@trel
Copy link
Member

trel commented Mar 14, 2025

very well, carry on.

@alanking
Copy link
Contributor Author

The test for which this change is being made isn't quite working, and it's possible that we can replace it in the not-too-distant future with a C++ unit test (which obviously does not depend on python-irodsclient).

We might be able to close this PR unless everybody sees the value of the submodule, as I do. :)

@korydraughn
Copy link
Contributor

korydraughn commented Mar 14, 2025

Let's leave it open for now. I think it's unlikely that the metadata guard will land in iRODS 5 given the issues with testing. I also don't feel that's a bad thing since we still have the plugin repo.

@korydraughn
Copy link
Contributor

Looks like there's still a chance for the metadata guard plugin to land in iRODS 5. See irods/irods#8289 (comment).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants