Conversation
austinvalle
reviewed
Feb 10, 2026
Member
austinvalle
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Just had one question, the rest LGTM 👍🏻
…atching on resource address
f449d63 to
ca45fd3
Compare
austinvalle
approved these changes
Feb 10, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Related Issue
Related to #597
Description
This is the first PR that addresses the problems outlined in #597 it does the following:
QuerySummariesproperty to collect all availableListCompleteMessage, if there are multiple list blocks in the config then there are multipleListCompleteMessageQuerySummarypropertyExpectLengthquery check to first match on the resource address before comparing the countexamplecloud_bananetteresource to cover additional test cases for this fixUp Next:
Rollback Plan
Changes to Security Controls
Are there any changes to security controls (access controls, encryption, logging) in this pull request? If so, explain.
None