Add analysis of upstream OpSi refactoring impact on branch merge#48
Add analysis of upstream OpSi refactoring impact on branch merge#48
Conversation
… OpSi refactoring Co-authored-by: guoh064 <50830808+guoh064@users.noreply.github.com>
|
@copilot I have os_ap_optimize, cl1_level_checking, os_collective branch which needs to be rebased to adapt to d1aed19 and re-merged into test branch. Please give instructions on how in detail I modify these three branches. |
… and os_collective branches Co-authored-by: guoh064 <50830808+guoh064@users.noreply.github.com>
I've added detailed rebase instructions for your three branches in commit Summary:
Each branch section in
|
…ication note Co-authored-by: guoh064 <50830808+guoh064@users.noreply.github.com>
|
@copilot halt current progress. |
Understood. Halting current progress. Let me know how you'd like to proceed. |
Upstream commit
d1aed19("Refactor: Opsi task managing") split the monolithicoperation_siren.py(~965 lines) into 12 task modules undermodule/os/tasks/. The user's branch was merged before this refactoring and needs guidance on re-merging.Analysis Document (
REBASE_ANALYSIS.md)os_daily()→tasks/daily.py,os_shop()→tasks/shop.py, etc.)Branch-Specific Instructions
Detailed rebase instructions for three specific branches:
os_ap_optimizeb112131module/os/tasks/hazard_leveling.pycl1_level_check71a086fmodule/os/tasks/hazard_leveling.pyor new task fileos_collectived203e6dmodule/os/tasks/target.pyEach section includes step-by-step git commands, conflict resolution guidance, and code snippets for migrating to the new modular structure.
New Structure
Original prompt
💬 We'd love your input! Share your thoughts on Copilot coding agent in our 2 minute survey.