Potential fixes for 5 code quality findings

[ardatan]

This PR applies 5/5 suggestions from code quality AI findings.

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @ardatan, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses five identified code quality issues, focusing on refining the codebase for better readability, maintainability, and minor performance gains. The changes involve refactoring variable names, simplifying conditional logic, and optimizing repetitive operations, all aimed at making the code cleaner and more robust.

Highlights

• Improved Variable Naming: Renamed the globalEmpty constant to EMPTY_VARIABLES_OBJECT for enhanced clarity and consistency within the codebase.
• Simplified Error Path Logic: Streamlined the getDefaultErrorPath function by removing a redundant conditional check, making the logic more concise.
• Removed Redundant Control Flow (1): Eliminated an unnecessary else { continue selectionLoop; } block within the projectSelectionSet function, improving code readability and efficiency.
• Removed Redundant Control Flow (2): Removed another redundant else { continue selectionLoop; } block in projectSelectionSet, further cleaning up the control flow.
• Optimized Object Key Length Check: Introduced a local variable to cache the result of Object.keys(result).length in projectRequires, preventing duplicate computations and improving performance.

Changelog

• packages/router-runtime/src/executor.ts
  • Renamed globalEmpty to EMPTY_VARIABLES_OBJECT for improved clarity.
  • Simplified the logic within the getDefaultErrorPath function.
  • Removed redundant else { continue selectionLoop; } statements in projectSelectionSet.
  • Optimized the projectRequires function by caching the result of Object.keys(result).length.

Activity

• No human activity has occurred on this pull request yet.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[theguild-bot]

🚀 Snapshot Release (alpha)

The latest changes of this PR are available as alpha on npm (based on the declared changesets):

Package	Version	Info
@graphql-hive/router-runtime	1.1.12-alpha-e32d3b1e95d0107a680fde4d0991ac70bed3f348	npm ↗︎ unpkg ↗︎

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request applies several fixes from a code quality tool. While most changes are beneficial, such as improving constant naming and refactoring for performance, two changes introduce critical bugs. The modifications to the handling of @skip and @include directives violate the GraphQL specification by incorrectly processing fields when the if argument is absent. These changes must be reverted to ensure correct query execution.

[gemini-code-assist]

This change introduces a bug by incorrectly handling the @skip directive. According to the GraphQL specification, if the if argument is not provided to @skip, the field must be excluded. Removing this else block violates this rule, causing fields with @skip (without an if argument) to be incorrectly included in the result. This logic should be restored.

Suggested change

	}
	} else {
	continue selectionLoop;
	}

[gemini-code-assist]

This change introduces a bug by incorrectly handling the @include directive. According to the GraphQL specification, if the if argument is not provided to @include, the field must be excluded. Removing this else block violates this rule, causing fields with @include (without an if argument) to be incorrectly processed instead of being skipped. This logic should be restored.

          } else {
            continue selectionLoop;
          }