Skip to content

Conversation

@alvarowolfx
Copy link
Collaborator

Towards #3592

@alvarowolfx alvarowolfx requested review from a team as code owners January 12, 2026 17:46
@alvarowolfx
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I don't know why the diff is looking weird here on Github. But I removed the test_impersonated_id_token_fail test as with retries, is not gonna hard fail in one call.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 12, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 94.83%. Comparing base (30e002e) to head (1eb1ad1).
⚠️ Report is 9 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #4257   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   94.82%   94.83%           
=======================================
  Files         187      187           
  Lines        7147     7159   +12     
=======================================
+ Hits         6777     6789   +12     
  Misses        370      370           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant