Skip to content

Conversation

@jswrenn
Copy link
Collaborator

@jswrenn jswrenn commented Jan 14, 2026

This trait powers invariant-respecting projection over Ptrs.


Latest Update: v2 — Compare vs v1

📚 Full Patch History

Links show the diff between the row version and the column version.

Version Base v1
v2 vs Base vs v1
v1 vs Base

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @jswrenn, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request introduces the ProjectField trait, a foundational component for enabling safe and invariant-respecting field projection within the system. This trait provides a structured way to access fields of Ptr types while upholding data integrity and safety guarantees, likely serving as an internal mechanism for future derive macros or similar functionalities.

Highlights

  • New ProjectField Trait: Introduced a new unsafe trait ProjectField designed for invariant-respecting projection over Ptrs. This trait is marked doc(hidden) and includes a method only_derive_is_allowed_to_implement_this_trait, indicating its intended use primarily by derive macros for internal mechanisms.
  • Trait Definition: The ProjectField trait defines associated types Invariants (for the projected field's pointer's invariants) and Error (for fallible projection), along with a project function that safely projects a field from a Ptr.
  • Safety Invariants: The trait explicitly states safety requirements for its implementations and for the project function, ensuring that the returned pointer refers to a non-strict subset of the original Ptr's bytes and maintains provenance.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces a new unsafe trait ProjectField to facilitate invariant-respecting projections over Ptrs. The new trait is well-defined and documented. My review includes a suggestion to correct a minor inconsistency in the documentation for the project method, where the parameter name used in the comments differs from the one in the function signature. Aligning these will improve clarity, which is crucial for an unsafe trait.

Comment on lines +1206 to +1213
/// Projects from `slf` to the field.
///
/// # Safety
///
/// The returned pointer refers to a non-strict subset of the bytes of
/// `slf`'s referent, and has the same provenance as `slf`.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The documentation for project refers to a parameter named slf, but the actual parameter is named ptr. To avoid confusion, especially in a safety-critical unsafe trait, the documentation should be updated to use the correct parameter name ptr.

    /// Projects from `ptr` to the field.
    ///
    /// # Safety
    ///
    /// The returned pointer refers to a non-strict subset of the bytes of
    /// `ptr`'s referent, and has the same provenance as `ptr`.

This trait powers invariant-respecting projection over `Ptr`s.

gherrit-pr-id: Gb6fa34cec5080caffa0980ed1d3e1ae273550f44
@jswrenn jswrenn force-pushed the Gb6fa34cec5080caffa0980ed1d3e1ae273550f44 branch from 7261c75 to 30859f4 Compare January 14, 2026 19:14
@jswrenn jswrenn force-pushed the G90165d85418ed6203ef3caaa77662dd3b313e030 branch from bb6f84e to c6f7382 Compare January 14, 2026 19:14
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
⚠️ Please upload report for BASE (G90165d85418ed6203ef3caaa77662dd3b313e030@c6f7382). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Additional details and impacted files
@@                             Coverage Diff                              @@
##             G90165d85418ed6203ef3caaa77662dd3b313e030    #2886   +/-   ##
============================================================================
  Coverage                                             ?   91.82%           
============================================================================
  Files                                                ?       20           
  Lines                                                ?     5883           
  Branches                                             ?        0           
============================================================================
  Hits                                                 ?     5402           
  Misses                                               ?      481           
  Partials                                             ?        0           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants