Skip to content

Conversation

@anastasiaterry814-a11y
Copy link

@anastasiaterry814-a11y anastasiaterry814-a11y commented Dec 22, 2025

This workflow runs tests and publishes a Node.js package to GitHub Packages upon release creation.

Why:

Closes:

What's being changed (if available, include any code snippets, screenshots, or gifs):

Check off the following:

  • A subject matter expert (SME) has reviewed the technical accuracy of the content in this PR. In most cases, the author can be the SME. Open source contributions may require an SME review from GitHub staff.
  • The changes in this PR meet the docs fundamentals that are required for all content.
  • All CI checks are passing and the changes look good in the review environment.

This workflow runs tests and publishes a Node.js package to GitHub Packages upon release creation.
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

How to review these changes 👓

Thank you for your contribution. To review these changes, choose one of the following options:

A Hubber will need to deploy your changes internally to review.

Table of review links

Note: Please update the URL for your staging server or codespace.

This pull request contains code changes, so we will not generate a table of review links.

🤖 This comment is automatically generated.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the triage Do not begin working on this issue until triaged by the team label Dec 22, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

👋 Hey there spelunker. It looks like you've modified some files that we can't accept as contributions:

  • .github/workflows/npm-publish-github-packages.yml

You'll need to revert all of the files you changed that match that list using GitHub Desktop or git checkout origin/main <file name>. Once you get those files reverted, we can continue with the review process. :octocat:

The complete list of files we can't accept are:

  • .devcontainer/**
  • .github/**
  • data/reusables/rai/**
  • Dockerfile*
  • src/**
  • package*.json
  • content/actions/how-tos/security-for-github-actions/security-hardening-your-deployments/**

We also can't accept contributions to files in the content directory with frontmatter type: rai or contentType: rai.

@sajadvilsin-cmyk
Copy link

  • >

How to review these changes 👓

Thank you for your contribution. To review these changes, choose one of the following options:

A Hubber will need to deploy your changes internally to review.

Table of review links

Note: Please update the URL for your staging server or codespace.

This pull request contains code changes, so we will not generate a table of review links.

🤖 This comment is automatically generated.

6 similar comments
@sajadvilsin-cmyk
Copy link

  • >

How to review these changes 👓

Thank you for your contribution. To review these changes, choose one of the following options:

A Hubber will need to deploy your changes internally to review.

Table of review links

Note: Please update the URL for your staging server or codespace.

This pull request contains code changes, so we will not generate a table of review links.

🤖 This comment is automatically generated.

@sajadvilsin-cmyk
Copy link

  • >

How to review these changes 👓

Thank you for your contribution. To review these changes, choose one of the following options:

A Hubber will need to deploy your changes internally to review.

Table of review links

Note: Please update the URL for your staging server or codespace.

This pull request contains code changes, so we will not generate a table of review links.

🤖 This comment is automatically generated.

@sajadvilsin-cmyk
Copy link

  • >

How to review these changes 👓

Thank you for your contribution. To review these changes, choose one of the following options:

A Hubber will need to deploy your changes internally to review.

Table of review links

Note: Please update the URL for your staging server or codespace.

This pull request contains code changes, so we will not generate a table of review links.

🤖 This comment is automatically generated.

@sajadvilsin-cmyk
Copy link

  • >

How to review these changes 👓

Thank you for your contribution. To review these changes, choose one of the following options:

A Hubber will need to deploy your changes internally to review.

Table of review links

Note: Please update the URL for your staging server or codespace.

This pull request contains code changes, so we will not generate a table of review links.

🤖 This comment is automatically generated.

@sajadvilsin-cmyk
Copy link

  • >

How to review these changes 👓

Thank you for your contribution. To review these changes, choose one of the following options:

A Hubber will need to deploy your changes internally to review.

Table of review links

Note: Please update the URL for your staging server or codespace.

This pull request contains code changes, so we will not generate a table of review links.

🤖 This comment is automatically generated.

@sajadvilsin-cmyk
Copy link

  • >

How to review these changes 👓

Thank you for your contribution. To review these changes, choose one of the following options:

A Hubber will need to deploy your changes internally to review.

Table of review links

Note: Please update the URL for your staging server or codespace.

This pull request contains code changes, so we will not generate a table of review links.

🤖 This comment is automatically generated.

@sajadvilsin-cmyk
Copy link

~~```

> 
> <!--
> Thank you for contributing to this project! You must fill out the information below before we can review this pull request. By explaining why you're making a change (or linking to an issue) and what changes you've made, we can triage your pull request to the best possible team for review.
> -->
> 
> ### Why:
> 
> <!-- Paste the issue link or number here -->
> Closes: 
> 
> <!-- If there's an existing issue for your change, please link to it above.
> If there's _not_ an existing issue, please open one first to make it more likely that this update will be accepted: https://github.com/github/docs/issues/new/choose. -->
> 
> ### What's being changed (if available, include any code snippets, screenshots, or gifs):
> 
> <!-- Let us know what you are changing. Share anything that could provide the most context.
> If you made changes to the `content` directory, a table will populate in a comment below with links to the review and current production articles. -->
> 
> ### Check off the following:
> 
> - [x] A subject matter expert (SME) has reviewed the technical accuracy of the content in this PR. In most cases, the author can be the SME. Open source contributions may require an SME review from GitHub staff.
> - [x] The changes in this PR meet [the docs fundamentals that are required for all content](http://docs.github.com/en/contributing/writing-for-github-docs/about-githubs-documentation-fundamentals).
> - [x] All CI checks are passing and the changes look good in the review environment.
> 

@sajadvilsin-cmyk
Copy link

Ok

@sajadvilsin-cmyk
Copy link

@sajadvilsin-cmyk

@sajadvilsin-cmyk
Copy link

This workflow runs tests and publishes a Node.js package to GitHub Packages upon release creation.

Why:

Closes:

What's being changed (if available, include any code snippets, screenshots, or gifs):

Check off the following:

  • A subject matter expert (SME) has reviewed the technical accuracy of the content in this PR. In most cases, the author can be the SME. Open source contributions may require an SME review from GitHub staff.
  • The changes in this PR meet the docs fundamentals that are required for all content.
  • All CI checks are passing and the changes look good in the review environment.

Copy link

@sajadvilsin-cmyk sajadvilsin-cmyk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link

@sajadvilsin-cmyk sajadvilsin-cmyk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.


Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

triage Do not begin working on this issue until triaged by the team

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants