Skip to content

Update BNF for correct &param=... syntax #10

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
gavinandresen wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Update BNF for correct &param=... syntax #10

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions bip-0021.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ Graphical bitcoin clients SHOULD register themselves as the handler for the "bit

bitcoinurn = "bitcoin:" bitcoinaddress [ "?" bitcoinparams ]
bitcoinaddress = base58 *base58
bitcoinparams = *bitcoinparam
bitcoinparams = bitcoinparam [ "&" bitcoinparams ]
standardparam = amountparam | labelparam | messageparam | otherparam
bitcoinparam = standardparam | reqparam
amountparam = "amount=" *digit [ "." *digit ]
Expand All @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ I.e. amount=50.00 or amount=50 is treated as 50 BTC, and amount=50,000.00 is inv

Bitcoin clients MAY display the amount in any format that is not intended to deceive the user.
They SHOULD choose a format that is foremost least confusing, and only after that most reasonable given the amount requested.
For example, so long as the majority of users work in BTC units, values should always be displayed in BTC by default, even if mBTC or TBC would otherwise be a more logical interpretation of the amount.
For example, so long as the majority of users work in BTC units, values should always be displayed in BTC by default, even if mBTC would otherwise be a more logical interpretation of the amount.
== Rationale ==

===Payment identifiers, not person identifiers===
Expand Down