Skip to content

Conversation

@dthaler
Copy link
Contributor

@dthaler dthaler commented Oct 26, 2025

Fixes #5
Fixes #19

Also addresses more of #8

@dthaler

This comment was marked as outdated.

* Split 7/age-all.ged into age-valid.ged vs age-invalid.ged to match
  the 5/age-valid.ged vs 5/age-invalid.ged split done in PR gedcom7code#24
* Add "TYPE test" to /5/age-*.ged to match the "TYPE test" added
  in 7/age-*.ged in PR gedcom7code#18
* Update age-all.ged to follow migration guide recommendations
  (issue gedcom7code#5).

Fixes gedcom7code#5
Fixes gedcom7code#19

Also addresses more of gedcom7code#8

Signed-off-by: Dave Thaler <dthaler1968@gmail.com>
@tychonievich tychonievich merged commit ecd4c6d into gedcom7code:main Oct 29, 2025
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

v5 age-all does not match v7 7/age-all.ged doesn't follow migration guide recommendations

2 participants