Conversation
Reviewer's GuideAdds release note entries to the changelog and introduces a new GitHub Actions workflow that uses the Claude code review action for automated PR reviews in this repository. Sequence diagram for Claude PR Review workflow executionsequenceDiagram
participant Dev as Developer
participant GH as GitHub
participant WF as Workflow_Claude_PR_Review
participant CO as actions_checkout_v4
participant CC as anthropics_claude_code_action
participant AN as Anthropic_API
Dev->>GH: Open or update pull request
GH-->>WF: Trigger pull_request event
WF->>CO: Checkout repository with fetch-depth 0
CO-->>WF: Repository checked out
WF->>CC: Run Claude code review job
CC->>AN: Call Claude API with anthropic_api_key
AN-->>CC: Return code review analysis
CC-->>GH: Post review comments on PR
Dev->>GH: Add PR comment containing @claude
GH-->>WF: Trigger issue_comment event
WF->>CC: Run Claude code review job (comment triggered)
CC->>AN: Call Claude API with context from comment
AN-->>CC: Return updated review
CC-->>GH: Post additional review comments on PR
File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hey - I've found 1 issue, and left some high level feedback:
- The
claude-pr-reviewworkflow currently runs on everypull_requestevent regardless of the@claudetrigger phrase; if the intent is on‑demand reviews only, tighten theif:condition to require the trigger phrase for PR events as well. - Consider pinning
anthropics/claude-code-actionto a specific version or commit instead of@betato avoid unexpected behavior from upstream changes in your CI pipeline.
Prompt for AI Agents
Please address the comments from this code review:
## Overall Comments
- The `claude-pr-review` workflow currently runs on every `pull_request` event regardless of the `@claude` trigger phrase; if the intent is on‑demand reviews only, tighten the `if:` condition to require the trigger phrase for PR events as well.
- Consider pinning `anthropics/claude-code-action` to a specific version or commit instead of `@beta` to avoid unexpected behavior from upstream changes in your CI pipeline.
## Individual Comments
### Comment 1
<location> `.github/workflows/claude-pr-review.yml:7-11` </location>
<code_context>
+ contents: read
+ pull-requests: write
+ issues: write
+ id-token: write
+jobs:
+ claude-review:
</code_context>
<issue_to_address>
**🚨 suggestion (security):** Consider dropping `id-token: write` permission if the workflow does not use OIDC
`id-token: write` lets the workflow request OIDC tokens, typically only needed for federated auth with external services (e.g., cloud providers). If this job doesn’t actually use OIDC, please remove this permission to adhere to least‑privilege access.
```suggestion
permissions:
contents: read
pull-requests: write
issues: write
```
</issue_to_address>Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.
Comment on lines
+7
to
+11
| permissions: | ||
| contents: read | ||
| pull-requests: write | ||
| issues: write | ||
| id-token: write |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🚨 suggestion (security): Consider dropping id-token: write permission if the workflow does not use OIDC
id-token: write lets the workflow request OIDC tokens, typically only needed for federated auth with external services (e.g., cloud providers). If this job doesn’t actually use OIDC, please remove this permission to adhere to least‑privilege access.
Suggested change
| permissions: | |
| contents: read | |
| pull-requests: write | |
| issues: write | |
| id-token: write | |
| permissions: | |
| contents: read | |
| pull-requests: write | |
| issues: write |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary by Sourcery
Update release notes and introduce an automated Claude-based pull request review workflow.
CI:
Documentation: