Provide PR evaluation: scope creep analysis and recommendations

[Copilot]

Responded to maintainer request for evaluation of PR scope and concerns. No code changes made.

Analysis Provided

Scope Assessment:

• 68 commits adding 4,665 lines across 33 files
• Core script grew 75% (979→1,713 lines)
• ~46 commits are fixes/wip/lint iterations indicating instability
• Added: Makefile, 4 CI workflows, 14 test files (~2,500 lines), shell completions, new CLI commands

Key Concerns Identified:

• Testing infrastructure rivals tool complexity
• New commands (clean, stat) may not be core functionality
• High commit churn suggests unclear planning
• Auto-generated completions/docs add maintenance burden

Recommendations:

1. Squash to 3-5 logical commits
2. Split into focused PRs: GPG multi-key fix (hero), basic CLI, optional tooling
3. Remove/defer: clean/stat commands, complex Makefile features, shell completions
4. Simplify CI to single lint+test workflow
5. Consider 2.0 versioning if proceeding with full scope

The GPG multi-key decryption fix is valuable; everything else needs justification against maintenance burden.

---

💡 You can make Copilot smarter by setting up custom instructions, customizing its development environment and configuring Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers. Learn more Copilot coding agent tips in the docs.

---

Summary by cubic

Revamps git-remote-gcrypt with a clearer CLI and safety checks to prevent accidental data loss. Simplifies flags and help text, adds confirmation/dry-run flows, and validates keys and remotes before any destructive action.

^{Written for commit 2ab441d. Summary will update on new commits.}