Draft: Extend syntax to allow ignore annotation on tests #8
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
phillord
added a commit
to phillord/test-generator
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 5, 2025
Previously additional outer attributes on the test_resource function are discarded. This allows passing any additional attributes. Addresses frehberg#8
phillord
added a commit
to phillord/test-generator
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 5, 2025
Previously additional outer attributes on the test_resource function are discarded. This allows passing any additional attributes. Addresses frehberg#8
phillord
added a commit
to phillord/test-generator
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 5, 2025
Previously additional outer attributes on the test_resource function are discarded. This allows passing any additional attributes. Addresses frehberg#8
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is a draft, the implementation is tested, but can certainly be improved. But I would like to ask for comments about the syntax first and whether this "feature" would have a chance to be accepted at all.
Bear with me, this is the first time I ever touched a Rust macro and also the first time I got in contact with syntax trees.
Supposedly fixes #7.