Skip to content

Conversation

@luizjhonata
Copy link
Collaborator

…cluded from sync

  • fixed missing exclude table command for the id_seq of the table ignored
  • fixed dropping the id_seq table for the ignored table

🚦 Quality checklist

  • Did you add the changes in the CHANGELOG.md? (don't forget the GitHub issue link!)
  • Did you run all the code checks? (pdm run black ., pdm run isort ., pdm run flake8 .)
  • Are the tests passing?

@luizjhonata luizjhonata force-pushed the fix/ignored-tables branch 9 times, most recently from bc696fa to 78b7d04 Compare May 21, 2025 17:41
…cluded from sync

- fixed missing exclude table command for the id_seq of the table ignored
- fixed dropping the id_seq table for the ignored table
- added required versions of jinja2 3.1.6 and cryptography 44.0.1 to avoid vulnerabilities
- updated required Python version to 3.9.2 for compatibility with the new cryptography version
- updated safety version from 3.0.1 to 3.5.1 to address vulnerabilities
- removed not used ignored-vulnerabilities from safety policy

Signed-off-by: Jhonata Luiz <jhonataluiz@hotmail.com>
@luizjhonata luizjhonata force-pushed the fix/ignored-tables branch from 78b7d04 to fcc457e Compare May 21, 2025 17:46
@luizjhonata luizjhonata self-assigned this May 21, 2025
@luizjhonata luizjhonata marked this pull request as ready for review May 21, 2025 17:50
@luizjhonata luizjhonata requested a review from rios0rios0 May 21, 2025 17:51
@rios0rios0 rios0rios0 merged commit 580d7e0 into main May 21, 2025
11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants