Skip to content

Conversation

@w31rd0
Copy link

@w31rd0 w31rd0 commented Aug 15, 2013

... not primary_key

@w31rd0 w31rd0 mentioned this pull request Aug 15, 2013
@euangoddard
Copy link

Will this break compatibility with previous versions?

@w31rd0
Copy link
Author

w31rd0 commented Aug 15, 2013

In fact it was never named primary_key, so nothing to break here, here's the first commit it appears in https://bitbucket.org/zzzeek/sqlalchemy/commits/a2f992a37ed3807bde61365a6c1072ae28b36599

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants