Skip to content

chore!: drop legacy eBPF probe build support#419

Merged
poiana merged 1 commit intofalcosecurity:masterfrom
ekoops:ekoops/drop-legacy-ebpf
Feb 6, 2026
Merged

chore!: drop legacy eBPF probe build support#419
poiana merged 1 commit intofalcosecurity:masterfrom
ekoops:ekoops/drop-legacy-ebpf

Conversation

@ekoops
Copy link
Contributor

@ekoops ekoops commented Feb 6, 2026

What type of PR is this?

Uncomment one (or more) /kind <> lines:

/kind bug

/kind cleanup

/kind design

/kind documentation

/kind failing-test

/kind feature

Any specific area of the project related to this PR?

Uncomment one (or more) /area <> lines:

/area build

/area cmd

/area pkg

/area docs

/area tests

What this PR does / why we need it:

Falco 0.43.0 deprecated legacy eBPF probe, and the support will be removed soon in the next libs release. This PR drops support for building it.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

chore!: drop legacy eBPF probe build support

Falco 0.43.0 deprecated legacy eBPF probe, and the support will
be removed soon in the next libs release. Drop support for building
it.

BREAKING CHANGE: drop support for building the legacy eBPF probe

Signed-off-by: Leonardo Di Giovanna <leonardodigiovanna1@gmail.com>
@poiana poiana added the lgtm label Feb 6, 2026
@poiana
Copy link

poiana commented Feb 6, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ekoops, leogr

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@poiana poiana added the approved label Feb 6, 2026
@poiana poiana merged commit 024c972 into falcosecurity:master Feb 6, 2026
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants