feat: added custom network button#64
Open
PatrickAlphaC wants to merge 33 commits intoeternalsafe:eternalsafefrom
Open
feat: added custom network button#64PatrickAlphaC wants to merge 33 commits intoeternalsafe:eternalsafefrom
PatrickAlphaC wants to merge 33 commits intoeternalsafe:eternalsafefrom
Conversation
|
@PatrickAlphaC is attempting to deploy a commit to the Eternal Safe Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
…ou can use any EVM chain!
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Feat/custom multi send
feat: fixed weird timing issue
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
Contributor
|
Thanks for this @PatrickAlphaC! <3 Could you resolve conflicts and fix the CI please (I've just approved it to run)? Or, if you prefer I can have a go at it? |
* Basic setup * Flow working * Fix test * update deps, create 1.4.1 safes and ensure it works on custom networks * update TS * update README env var section --------- Co-authored-by: Devan Non <devanon@chainstride.capital>
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Author
|
Fixed!... This resulted in a lot of files being changed :/ If this is way too much... Let me know. I understand that this PR is... A lot. |
|
What can we do to get this across the line? This would be a huge boon for networks like Hyperliquid |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What it solves
A UI for adding custom chains. The main safe website doesn't make sense to support this because they would need to setup their transaction service. For our locally running UI, we don't need/care about that.
Additionally, we added a feature for adding custom multi-send so that any EVM chain is compatible with this UI!
Resolves #
#25
How this PR fixes it
2025-04-19.22-04-51.mov
How to test it
create custom chainin the safe dropdownScreenshots
Checklist
I'm working on fixing the custom multi-send contract address next.