Skip to content

Conversation

@ericfell
Copy link
Owner

@ericfell ericfell commented Sep 8, 2025

No description provided.

@ericfell ericfell requested a review from jeremyfell September 8, 2025 20:06
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Sep 8, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (ad5e183) to head (7d6c216).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master       #31   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            2         2           
  Lines          397       397           
=========================================
  Hits           397       397           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link
Collaborator

@jeremyfell jeremyfell left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM overall

"id": "7b5565cb",
"metadata": {},
"source": [
"### word of caution...different diffusion coefficient values still give the same CV under E_rev conditions (the beauty of Nernstian kinetics!)"
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: let's format these as full sentences

Suggested change
"### word of caution...different diffusion coefficient values still give the same CV under E_rev conditions (the beauty of Nernstian kinetics!)"
"### A word of caution: different diffusion coefficient values still give the same CV under E_rev conditions (the beauty of Nernstian kinetics!)."

Also do we want this text as subheadings (i.e. using ###) or just as regular text? It shows up fairly big in the notebook

"metadata": {},
"source": [
"## Example: fit the EE mechanism, now with some known priors\n",
"### we will assume that diffusion/transfer coefficients were obtained experimentally from RDE, and an educated guess for the ranges of electrochemical rate constants is known"
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
"### we will assume that diffusion/transfer coefficients were obtained experimentally from RDE, and an educated guess for the ranges of electrochemical rate constants is known"
"### We will assume that diffusion/transfer coefficients were obtained experimentally from the RDE, and an educated guess for the ranges of electrochemical rate constants is known."

"id": "0fa7456c",
"metadata": {},
"source": [
"### the `.fit()` method can optionally receive: a `float` for initial guess of parameter; `tuple[float, float]` for (lower bound, upper bound) of the initial guess; or `tuple[float, float, float]` for (initial guess, lower bound, upper bound)"
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
"### the `.fit()` method can optionally receive: a `float` for initial guess of parameter; `tuple[float, float]` for (lower bound, upper bound) of the initial guess; or `tuple[float, float, float]` for (initial guess, lower bound, upper bound)"
"### The `fit` method can optionally receive: a `float` for an initial guess of the parameter; `tuple[float, float]` for (lower bound, upper bound) of the parameter; or `tuple[float, float, float]` for (initial guess, lower bound, upper bound)."

@ericfell ericfell merged commit 5f685ca into master Sep 9, 2025
8 checks passed
@ericfell ericfell deleted the second-fit-example branch September 21, 2025 20:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants