Skip to content

Conversation

@stsdc
Copy link
Member

@stsdc stsdc commented Nov 21, 2025

Fixes #500

@danirabbit I have basically removed your code to make it work again. Do you remember why it was added?

@stsdc stsdc requested a review from danirabbit November 21, 2025 12:51
@stsdc stsdc force-pushed the stsdc/fix-run-in-background-switch branch from 6cd3a24 to cf123ae Compare November 21, 2025 12:52
Copy link
Member

@danirabbit danirabbit left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@stsdc Ah I'm not actually sure what this is about. Maybe it was supposed to make sure you couldn't get into a funny state like indicator on, but background off or something. But let's remove it and we can revisit if its a problem

@danirabbit danirabbit enabled auto-merge (squash) November 24, 2025 19:08
@danirabbit danirabbit merged commit 799c8e6 into main Nov 24, 2025
7 checks passed
@danirabbit danirabbit deleted the stsdc/fix-run-in-background-switch branch November 24, 2025 19:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Starting in the background option doesn't seem to work

3 participants