fix(lumnismon.lic): v1.2.1 fix in colorizing table

[mrhoribu]

Important

Fixes colorizing table output in lumnismon.lic by adding colorization functions and refactoring table display logic.

• Behavior:
  • Fixes colorizing table output in lumnismon.lic by adding colorize_table_output() in display_character_table() and display_unified_table().
  • Handles nil or empty minute_value in parse_minutes_to_string() by returning "0h0m".
• Table Structure:
  • Refactors report_by_account() to build a unified table with account headers and separators.
  • Adds display_unified_table() to handle unified table display logic.
• Colorization:
  • Implements colorize_table_output() to apply color presets to table rows based on content.
  • Adds colorize_data_row() and colorize_cell() for detailed cell-level colorization.

^{This description was created by for 88d010f. You can customize this summary. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.}

[ellipsis-dev]

Important

Looks good to me! 👍

Reviewed everything up to 88d010f in 2 minutes and 36 seconds. Click for details.

• Reviewed 300 lines of code in 1 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 8 draft comments. View those below.
• Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.

1. scripts/lumnismon.lic:9

• Draft comment:
  Version bump to 1.2.1 and added changelog looks correct.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = 0% <= threshold 50% This comment is purely informative and does not provide any actionable feedback or suggestions for improvement. It simply states that the version bump and changelog look correct, which is not necessary for the PR author to know.

2. scripts/lumnismon.lic:696

• Draft comment:
  Nil/empty check in parse_minutes_to_string prevents errors. Good defensive coding.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

3. scripts/lumnismon.lic:780

• Draft comment:
  report_by_account now builds a unified table with account header rows. Verify that account names with spaces are still colorized as expected.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

4. scripts/lumnismon.lic:888

• Draft comment:
  The regex in colorize_table_output for account headers only matches [A-Z0-9]. Consider broadening it to support names with spaces or punctuation.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50% The comment is speculative ("Consider broadening it to support...") rather than identifying a definite bug. The regex [A-Z0-9]+ would fail to match account names that contain spaces, hyphens, underscores, or other punctuation. However, I don't have evidence from the diff that account names actually contain such characters. The user can set their account name via --char-account setting (line 1662), so theoretically they could use any string. But the current code might work fine if all actual account names only use alphanumeric characters. This is a speculative comment about a potential edge case, not a definite bug. According to the rules, I should NOT make speculative comments like "If X, then Y is an issue" - only comment if it's definitely an issue. Without seeing actual account names in use or documentation about what characters are allowed in account names, I cannot definitively say this is a bug. The code might work perfectly fine for all real-world account names. The comment is speculative and suggests a "consideration" rather than identifying a concrete problem. While the critique is valid that this is speculative, the fact that account names are user-configurable (via --char-account) means users could potentially enter names with spaces or special characters. However, the rules explicitly state "Do NOT make speculative comments" and this comment uses the word "Consider" which is suggestive rather than definitive. This comment is speculative and uses language like "Consider" which suggests it's not identifying a definite issue. Per the rules against speculative comments, this should be deleted. There's no strong evidence that account names will contain non-alphanumeric characters.

5. scripts/lumnismon.lic:949

• Draft comment:
  The case statement in colorize_cell is quite repetitive. Consider refactoring common preset logic into helper methods for better maintainability.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50% <= threshold 50% None

6. scripts/lumnismon.lic:1041

• Draft comment:
  Converting data to string in build_table_row (e.g. using to_s) is a good defensive measure against nil values.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = 0% <= threshold 50% This comment is purely informative and does not provide any actionable feedback or suggestions for improvement. It simply states that converting data to string is a defensive measure, which does not align with the rules for useful comments.

7. scripts/lumnismon.lic:1068

• Draft comment:
  Returning an empty string in format_check_time for nil or empty input is appropriate.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = 0% <= threshold 50% This comment is purely informative and does not provide any actionable feedback or suggestions for improvement. It simply states that the current implementation is appropriate, which does not align with the guidelines for useful comments.

8. scripts/lumnismon.lic:918

• Draft comment:
  colorize_data_row splits table lines by '|' – ensure that actual cell content cannot contain pipe characters, or this may split incorrectly.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50% <= threshold 50% None

Workflow ID: wflow_p2Aw7KAUL6A2Iv0l

^{You can customize by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with 👍 or 👎, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.}