ILP: Add 'limp' as a native-dependency-less option#1
Open
tomsmeding wants to merge 6 commits intodpvanbalen:new-pipelinefrom
Open
ILP: Add 'limp' as a native-dependency-less option#1tomsmeding wants to merge 6 commits intodpvanbalen:new-pipelinefrom
tomsmeding wants to merge 6 commits intodpvanbalen:new-pipelinefrom
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I've added a Haskell-only alternative to
MIP, i.e. an ILP solver that doesn't require an external tool. I haven't tested this at all; it's inspired by code that I've tested locally that does work for a simple smoke-test ILP, but I've only compiled the code after integration into accelerate.Please test this thoroughly. ;p
Motivation
I don't want it to be necessary to install more external tools in order to run Accelerate. LLVM is already enough pain.
Further notes
What's going on with the non-typechecking
iteB? I commented it out in a separate commit for now, otherwise the code doesn't build.