feat(ci): test action

[kevinlin09]

Description

[Describe what this PR does and why]

Related Issue: Fixes #[issue_number] or Relates to #[issue_number]

Security Considerations: [Check if API keys or sensitive credentials are exposed in code/logs]

Type of Change

• Bug fix
• New feature
• Breaking change
• Documentation
• Refactoring

Component(s) Affected

• Model
• Application
• Common
• Documentation
• Tests
• CI/CD

Checklist

• Pre-commit hooks pass
• Tests pass locally
• Documentation updated (if needed)
• Ready for review

Testing

[How to test these changes]

Additional Notes

[Optional: any other context]

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @kevinlin09, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request primarily involves a minor cleanup of a code comment. A placeholder (TODO: api key doc) was removed from the api_key parameter's documentation in the application.py file. While the PR title suggests a CI-related feature, the actual code changes in the provided patch are limited to this small documentation refinement.

Highlights

• Comment Cleanup: A (TODO: api key doc) comment was removed from the api_key parameter description within the call method of dashscope/app/application.py. This is a minor documentation cleanup.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request removes a TODO comment from a docstring in dashscope/app/application.py. While removing TODOs is a good practice, the documentation for the 'default rule' of API key resolution remains vague. I have provided a suggestion to clarify this by pointing to the specific function that handles the logic, which will improve the clarity and usability of the API for developers.

[gemini-code-assist]

Removing the TODO is a good step, but the description 'if None, will get by default rule' is still ambiguous for the user. To improve clarity, it would be better to either briefly explain the rule or point to the function that implements it.

Suggested change

	if None, will get by default rule
	if None, it is resolved automatically via dashscope.get_default_api_key().