fixes mem0 with valkey/redis issue

[MatthiasHowellYopp]

changes to support using mem0 with valkey/redis as external memory provider for crewai

fixes #4031

---

Note

Medium Risk
Changes query filter shape sent to local Mem0 backends for Valkey/Redis, which can affect search results/partitioning if misapplied. Risk is mitigated by extensive new tests covering provider and cloud/local combinations.

Overview
Fixes Mem0Storage search filtering for local Mem0 backends using Valkey/Redis by flattening a single AND condition (e.g., { "AND": [{...}] } -> {...}) since those vector stores don’t support Mem0’s AND/OR filter structure.

Adds regression coverage around Valkey/Redis vs other providers, ensures MemoryClient (cloud) never flattens filters even if local_mem0_config is present, and hardens config parsing for None local_mem0_config/vector_store. Test isolation is also improved by resetting the last event ID in conftest.py.

^{Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit fe7a87e. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure here.}

[Vidit-Ostwal]

Hey @MatthiasHowellYopp, maybe you can collapse all the commits into one for a cleaner git history

Try this

git checkout feature-branch
git reset --soft main
git commit -m "Add <feature-name>"
git push --force-with-lease

I am not a maintainer, feel free to ignore this...

[greysonlalonde]

Hey @MatthiasHowellYopp, maybe you can collapse all the commits into one for a cleaner git history

Try this

git checkout feature-branch
git reset --soft main
git commit -m "Add <feature-name>"
git push --force-with-lease

I am not a maintainer, feel free to ignore this...

This would be great!

[cursor]

Cursor Bugbot has reviewed your changes and found 1 potential issue.

^{Bugbot Autofix is OFF. To automatically fix reported issues with Cloud Agents, enable Autofix in the Cursor dashboard.}

[MatthiasHowellYopp]

@greysonlalonde changes done, looks like I need you (or someone) to let the checks run.

[MatthiasHowellYopp]

@greysonlalonde can you review - or recommend someone who can? tks.

[MatthiasHowellYopp]

@greysonlalonde Can we try again? looks lIke I need workflow approval and a review.

[MatthiasHowellYopp]

@greysonlalonde Is there something I can do to get this to the other side of merged? Seems I'm back to needing the checks permitted.