Skip to content

Conversation

@pratyush07-hub
Copy link
Contributor

@pratyush07-hub pratyush07-hub commented Jan 18, 2026

Related Issue

Closes #642

Summary

added CLA signature

Checklist

  • PR title follows format: type(scope): description or [scope] description
  • Tests pass (pytest tests/)
  • MVP label added if closing MVP issue
  • Update "Cortex -h" (if needed)

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Added a new individual to the project's CLA signers list.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@github-actions
Copy link

CLA Verification Failed

The following contributors have not signed the Contributor License Agreement:

How to Sign

  1. Read the CLA document
  2. Open a CLA signature request
  3. A maintainer will add you to the signers list
  4. Comment recheck on this PR to re-run verification

This check runs automatically. Maintainers can update .github/cla-signers.json to add signers.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 18, 2026

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

A new Contributor License Agreement signer object for Pratyush Kumar was added to the top-level "individuals" array in .github/cla-signers.json (name, GitHub username, email, signed_date, cla_version). No other structural or behavioral changes were made.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
CLA Signer Registry
​.github/cla-signers.json
Inserted a new individual entry for Pratyush Kumar (github_username: pratyush07-hub, emails: choudharypratyush809@gmail.com, signed_date: 2026-01-18, cla_version: 1.0) into the individuals array.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~5 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • mikejmorgan-ai
  • Suyashd999
  • Anshgrover23

Poem

🐰
A tiny hop, a steady pen,
I added a name to welcome them.
Pratyush joins our list today,
A signature in simple array.
Hooray — the registry grows this way!

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description check ✅ Passed The description includes required sections (Related Issue, Summary, Checklist) but lacks the AI Disclosure section specified in the template.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed The PR successfully implements the requirements from linked issue #642 by adding Pratyush Kumar's CLA signature information to the cla-signers.json file with all required details.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed All changes are directly related to adding the CLA signer entry as specified in issue #642; no out-of-scope modifications are present.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Title check ✅ Passed The title 'feat: add CLA signer Pratyush Kumar' accurately and specifically summarizes the main change—adding a new CLA signer entry to the cla-signers.json file.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @pratyush07-hub, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request integrates a new contributor by formally recording their Contributor License Agreement (CLA) signature. This ensures that future contributions from this individual are legally compliant with the project's licensing terms, facilitating a smooth and legally sound open-source collaboration process.

Highlights

  • New CLA Signer Added: The pull request adds a new entry for 'Pratyush Kumar' with the GitHub username 'pratyush07-hub' and email 'choudharypratyush809@gmail.com' to the cla-signers.json file, indicating their Contributor License Agreement (CLA) was signed on '2026-01-18'.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request adds a new entry for a CLA signer, Pratyush Kumar, to the .github/cla-signers.json file. The change is a straightforward data addition. The new JSON object is well-formed and consistent with existing entries. The change looks good and is ready to be merged.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Caution

Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.

⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
.github/cla-signers.json (1)

3-3: Update last_updated to reflect this change.

The last_updated field is "2026-01-13", but this PR adds a new signer dated "2026-01-18". Consider updating this field to maintain accurate metadata.

Proposed fix
-  "last_updated": "2026-01-13",
+  "last_updated": "2026-01-18",
🤖 Fix all issues with AI agents
In @.github/cla-signers.json:
- Around line 260-261: Remove the trailing comma after the final object in the
"individuals" array so the JSON is valid; locate the "individuals" array in
.github/cla-signers.json and delete the comma following the last closing brace
(ensure the array then ends with ] and the file with } without any extra
commas).

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Copy link
Collaborator

@Anshgrover23 Anshgrover23 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

approve.

@Anshgrover23 Anshgrover23 changed the title Add new CLA signer Pratyush Kumar cla: add CLA signer Pratyush Kumar Jan 18, 2026
@Anshgrover23 Anshgrover23 changed the title cla: add CLA signer Pratyush Kumar feat: add CLA signer Pratyush Kumar Jan 18, 2026
@Anshgrover23 Anshgrover23 merged commit b2c1928 into cortexlinux:main Jan 18, 2026
10 of 15 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

CLA Signature: Pratyush Kumar

2 participants