-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 384
linux: do not leak errors #1971
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @eriksjolund, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request addresses a critical aspect of resource management within the Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request correctly identifies and fixes several memory leaks in error handling paths by releasing the existing error object before creating a new one. While this fixes the leaks, it discards the original error message from the underlying function call, which could be valuable for debugging. A better approach would be to use crun_error_wrap(), which prepends a new contextual message to the existing error, preserving the original details. This would also make the code more concise. I've added suggestions to each of the locations to use crun_error_wrap() instead.
|
TMT tests failed. @containers/packit-build please check. |
|
Do you prefer using |
|
I realised I forgot to use |
Suggestion by gemini-code-assist in containers#1971 was amended. Signed-off-by: Erik Sjölund <erik.sjolund@gmail.com>
5978a75 to
f5bb7ed
Compare
Suggestion by gemini-code-assist in containers#1971 was amended. Signed-off-by: Erik Sjölund <erik.sjolund@gmail.com>
f5bb7ed to
6733e20
Compare
|
Ephemeral COPR build failed. @containers/packit-build please check. |
1 similar comment
|
Ephemeral COPR build failed. @containers/packit-build please check. |
|
TMT tests failed. @containers/packit-build please check. |
giuseppe
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
No description provided.