Skip to content

Conversation

@codeunia-dev
Copy link
Owner

@codeunia-dev codeunia-dev commented Nov 25, 2025

Validate and explicitly export SUPABASE_DB_URL in the backup workflow

Authored by: @akshay0611

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Enhanced backup workflow reliability by adding validation to ensure required configuration is properly set before execution.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Nov 25, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
codeunia Building Building Preview Comment Nov 25, 2025 4:01am

@codeunia-dev codeunia-dev merged commit ce360de into main Nov 25, 2025
2 of 4 checks passed
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 25, 2025

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

A GitHub Actions workflow now includes a pre-check step to verify that SUPABASE_DB_URL is set from secrets, failing if empty or logging its length if present. The backup script step explicitly exports this variable before execution, creating conditional control flow.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Workflow validation and export
\.github/workflows/backup\.yml
Added "Verify SUPABASE_DB_URL is set" step that validates the presence of the secret and errors if missing. Modified "Run backup script" step to explicitly export SUPABASE_DB_URL before executing backup.sh.

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant GH as GitHub Actions
    participant Verify as Verify Step
    participant Export as Export Step
    participant Script as backup.sh

    GH->>Verify: Read SUPABASE_DB_URL from secrets
    alt URL is empty
        Verify-->>GH: ❌ Error & Exit
    else URL is set
        Verify->>Verify: Log URL length
        Verify->>GH: ✓ Continue
        GH->>Export: Export SUPABASE_DB_URL
        Export->>Script: Execute backup.sh
        Script->>Script: Run with SUPABASE_DB_URL
    end
Loading

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

  • Single file affected with straightforward additions: a validation step and environment variable export.
  • Changes are primarily declarative YAML configuration with no complex logic.

Possibly related PRs

Poem

🐰 A rabbit hops through workflows bright,
Checks secrets gently left and right,
"Is DB_URL here?" we cry with care,
Before backup runs—let's verify there!
✨🔐

✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch feat/supabase-disaster-recovery-system

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 40b5c0a and 424a2ab.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/backup.yml (1 hunks)

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants