forked from projeto-siga/siga
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
[BugFix] Ocultar módulos não utilizados #346
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
caiosantos-codata
wants to merge
5
commits into
pbdoc/develop
Choose a base branch
from
bugfix/remover-modulos-nao-utilizados
base: pbdoc/develop
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
704a7a3
wip: filtrar módulos não utilizados
caiosantos-codata 81dc2fd
Merge branch 'pbdoc/develop' into bugfix/remover-modulos-nao-utilizados
caiosantos-codata 13af8ac
recuperar serviço baseado apenas no cache inicializado
caiosantos-codata 0d8fd87
refatoramento da lista de módulos não utilizados
caiosantos-codata 2112f3c
adicionar módulos 'transporte' e 'workflow' ao conjunto de módulos nã…
caiosantos-codata File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@caiosantos-codata não faço idéia se dá pra a gente remover isso. Eu sei que tem inclusive uma tabela no banco que usa essa forma de construir serviços:
XXX;YYY;ZZZetc... Qual a motivação pra isso? Como a gente garante que isso não vai causar problemas? Pode dar mais detalhes?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@michelrisucci-codata, sua preocupação faz sentido.
esse trecho é reponsável por recuperar serviços que não estão no cache, que é inicializado no método
consultarCpServicoPorChave.O cache, por sua vez, é obtido a partir da tabelaCpServico.Entendi que isso foi uma forma de 'contornar' os serviços listados no banco. Naveguei no histórico de commits e não achei uma razao para isso.
Não há garantia total que não causará problemas. Porém, o risco é limitado já que a ideia é ocultar serviço que não são utilizados.
ficou mais claro?