feat: ✨ add cloudProvider for specificity #990
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Falltrades
force-pushed
the
feat/cloudProvider
branch
from
49f4f10 to
1629e3d
Compare
iliesmrf
reviewed
Jan 29, 2026
iliesmrf
reviewed
Jan 29, 2026
Contributor
iliesmrf
left a comment
iliesmrf
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Variabliser la liste d’exception
iliesmrf
approved these changes
Jan 29, 2026
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Issues liées
Issues numéro: #975
Quel est le comportement actuel ?
Related to #911, some cloud providers suddenly stop supporting AES encryption which made CNPG backup fail.
We were adding manually in our values repositories.
Quel est le nouveau comportement ?
Time to automate this.
Cette PR introduit-elle un breaking change ?
No.
Autres informations
We could have use
dscvalues but need this to be fixed first: #788