Skip to content

Conversation

@alexfurmenkov
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@alexfurmenkov alexfurmenkov marked this pull request as ready for review January 20, 2026 15:04
@alexfurmenkov alexfurmenkov changed the title 1345 correctly preprocess supp and relrec datasets 1345: correctly preprocess supp and relrec datasets Jan 20, 2026
Copy link
Collaborator

@SFJohnson24 SFJohnson24 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this looks good--can you make 1 test in tests/unit/test_dataset_preprocessor for the SUPPDM logic? I appreciate the regression tests but want this also in the unittests

@SFJohnson24 SFJohnson24 self-requested a review January 23, 2026 22:00
Copy link
Collaborator

@SFJohnson24 SFJohnson24 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

PR adds improved suppDM relrec handling. Behaves as expected, adds regression test and unit tests

CORE-Report-2026-01-23T16-51-42.xlsx

Copy link
Collaborator

@RamilCDISC RamilCDISC left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The PR fixes the preprocessing for supp and relrec datasets. The validation was done by:

  1. Reviewing the PR for any unwanted code or comments.
  2. Reviewing the PR logic in accordance with AC.
  3. Ensuring all unit and regression testing pass.
  4. Ensuring new testing cover required test cases.
  5. manual validation using rule editor with positive and negative dataset.
  6. Manual validation using CLI with postive and negative dataset.
  7. Running and ensuring the new regression test.

@SFJohnson24 SFJohnson24 merged commit 54a3da7 into main Jan 27, 2026
12 checks passed
@SFJohnson24 SFJohnson24 deleted the 1345-correctly-preprocess-supp-and-relrec-datasets branch January 27, 2026 13:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants