Skip to content

Conversation

@kolmanthomas
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.


Comments on existing commits:
- [octave: temporary workaround for f.funs{j}] not quite sure what the error is here, chaining subsref seems to work when I create toy examples
- [silence warning by reordering switch]: no longer produces a warning when fieldnames is called on a classdef
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

do you mean this particular patch is not longer needed?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, I don't think those two patches are needed anymore, though I might be wrong about the subsref one, I'm not sure what the original problem was or what the workaround was designed to achieve

Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe you can try reverting that commit, check that test octave_tests passes and sending a MR against octave_dev25?

@cbm755
Copy link
Owner

cbm755 commented Apr 28, 2025

ok, I'm going to merge this and then cherry-pick it into #4, which is the same as octave_dev but rebased against latest upstream and has Oksana's BIST.

@cbm755 cbm755 merged commit 549eb58 into cbm755:octave_dev Apr 28, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants