Skip to content

Conversation

@dynobo
Copy link
Collaborator

@dynobo dynobo commented Aug 20, 2025

The intention is to ease keeping track of the progress with respect to the configured limits.
What do you think?

Example output:

[...]
 'settings': {},
 'stacktrace': None,
 'user_info': None}
2025-08-20 10:38:00,510 - blackboxopt - INFO - Starting evaluation 17 (of inf). Overall runtime so far: 0:00:08 (timeout at 0:01:00)
2025-08-20 10:38:00,510 - blackboxopt - INFO - The optimizer proposed the following evaluation specification:
{'configuration': {'criterion': 'poisson',
                   'max_depth': 44,
[...]

@dynobo dynobo force-pushed the feature/log-evaluation-counts-in-sequential-loop branch from 13eb8f8 to 6bc5edc Compare August 20, 2025 08:51
Signed-off-by: Holger Buech (CR/AIR2.2) <holger.buech@de.bosch.com>
@dynobo dynobo force-pushed the feature/log-evaluation-counts-in-sequential-loop branch from 6bc5edc to 6283300 Compare August 20, 2025 08:53
@github-actions
Copy link

Coverage report

Click to see where and how coverage changed

FileStatementsMissingCoverageCoverage
(new stmts)
Lines missing
  blackboxopt/optimization_loops
  sequential.py
Project Total  

This report was generated by python-coverage-comment-action

@dynobo dynobo requested review from LGro and sfalkner August 20, 2025 08:56
@dynobo dynobo marked this pull request as ready for review August 20, 2025 09:37
@dynobo dynobo merged commit 40d8a2d into main Aug 21, 2025
9 checks passed
@dynobo dynobo deleted the feature/log-evaluation-counts-in-sequential-loop branch August 21, 2025 08:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants