feat: local provider scheduled command adapter unit test#1361
Draft
javiertoledo wants to merge 4 commits intomainfrom
Draft
feat: local provider scheduled command adapter unit test#1361javiertoledo wants to merge 4 commits intomainfrom
javiertoledo wants to merge 4 commits intomainfrom
Conversation
Contributor
|
Oops, looks like you forgot to add a changeset.
This command will prompt you for a change description and generate a changeset file. You can read more about changesets here. Remember that you should use the version bump that is appropriate for the change you are making:
If you are unsure about which version bump to use, please ask in the comments and we will help you out. |
3 tasks
javiertoledo
force-pushed
the
feat/local-schedule-unit-tests
branch
from
4d22bd3 to
f44c007
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR is a rework of the PR #1095 originally posted by @hackykitty
This PR seems to significantly overlap the changes in #1362, which implement way more extensive tests, so we'll be merging #1362 first and come back to the changes here later.