Skip to content

Conversation

@basebandit
Copy link
Owner

Description

Please include a summary of the changes and the related issue. Please also include relevant motivation and context.

  • Review suggestions by codex.

Type of change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • Documentation update

Checklist:

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules

Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR addresses code review suggestions by implementing bug fixes and improvements to ensure more robust and deterministic behavior in cluster management and CronJob formatting.

Changes:

  • Added alphabetical sorting to ListContexts() for deterministic ordering
  • Fixed potential index out of bounds panic in formatCronJobList() when handling empty CronJob lists
  • Enhanced test coverage for the above changes

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 4 out of 4 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

File Description
cluster/manager.go Added sorting logic to return contexts in alphabetical order, imported sort package
cluster/manager_test.go Added assertions to verify contexts are returned in the expected alphabetical order
cluster/formatted.go Added bounds check to prevent panic when accessing Items[0] on empty CronJob list
cluster/formatted_test.go Added test case to verify proper handling of empty CronJob lists

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment on lines 1250 to 1256
t.Run("Format empty cronjob list", func(t *testing.T) {
cronJobList := &batchv1.CronJobList{Items: []batchv1.CronJob{}}

result := formatCronJobList(cronJobList, false)
assert.Contains(t, result, "CronJobs in namespace:")
assert.Contains(t, result, "Total: 0 CronJob(s)")
})
Copy link

Copilot AI Jan 25, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The line has incorrect indentation with an extra tab. The t.Run call should be at the same indentation level as the other test cases in this function (lines 1108, 1151, 1183, 1205, 1229).

Suggested change
t.Run("Format empty cronjob list", func(t *testing.T) {
cronJobList := &batchv1.CronJobList{Items: []batchv1.CronJob{}}
result := formatCronJobList(cronJobList, false)
assert.Contains(t, result, "CronJobs in namespace:")
assert.Contains(t, result, "Total: 0 CronJob(s)")
})
t.Run("Format empty cronjob list", func(t *testing.T) {
cronJobList := &batchv1.CronJobList{Items: []batchv1.CronJob{}}
result := formatCronJobList(cronJobList, false)
assert.Contains(t, result, "CronJobs in namespace:")
assert.Contains(t, result, "Total: 0 CronJob(s)")
})

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 4 out of 4 changed files in this pull request and generated no new comments.


💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

@basebandit basebandit merged commit 1002837 into main Jan 25, 2026
15 checks passed
@basebandit basebandit deleted the chore/cluster-review-suggestions branch January 25, 2026 19:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants