Skip to content

Conversation

@Jagriti-student
Copy link
Contributor

@Jagriti-student Jagriti-student commented Dec 8, 2025

This PR fixes typos and improves clarity in docstrings across the project.

  • Corrected spelling mistakes in docstrings (e.g., funciton → function, recieve → receive)
  • Improved readability of docstrings for functions and classes

closes #8

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Added example code demonstrating adapter implementation and usage patterns.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@continue
Copy link

continue bot commented Dec 8, 2025

Keep this PR in a mergeable state →

Learn more

All Green is an AI agent that automatically:

✅ Addresses code review comments

✅ Fixes failing CI checks

✅ Resolves merge conflicts

Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR aims to fix typos and improve docstring clarity, but contains a critical issue: it adds a new example file (examples/basic_evaluation.py) that uses non-existent APIs and incorrect import paths, making it completely non-functional.

  • Reformats docstrings from single-line to multi-line format across core modules
  • Adds a new example file that attempts to demonstrate basic evaluation
  • Despite the PR description mentioning typo corrections (funciton → function, recieve → receive), no actual spelling corrections are present in the diffs

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 7 out of 7 changed files in this pull request and generated 5 comments.

Show a summary per file
File Description
src/agentunit/core/trace.py Reformatted module and class docstrings to multi-line format
src/agentunit/core/scenario.py Reformatted module and method docstrings to multi-line format
src/agentunit/core/runner.py Reformatted module docstring to multi-line format
src/agentunit/core/replay.py Reformatted module and function docstrings to multi-line format
src/agentunit/core/exceptions.py Reformatted module and class docstrings to multi-line format
src/agentunit/core/init.py Reformatted module docstring to multi-line format
examples/basic_evaluation.py New example file with multiple critical bugs: non-existent imports, incorrect API usage, and improper BaseAdapter implementation

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment on lines 10 to 13
from agentunit.core.evaluator import Evaluator
from agentunit.core.adapters import BaseAdapter


Copy link

Copilot AI Dec 8, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The import path agentunit.core.evaluator does not exist in the codebase. There is no Evaluator class in the agentunit.core module. The existing evaluator functionality appears to be in agentunit.privacy.federation.FederatedEvaluator, but that serves a different purpose. This import will cause an ImportError at runtime.

Suggested change
from agentunit.core.evaluator import Evaluator
from agentunit.core.adapters import BaseAdapter
# Removed invalid import: from agentunit.core.evaluator import Evaluator
from agentunit.core.adapters import BaseAdapter
class Result:
def __init__(self, output, score):
self.output = output
self.score = score
class Evaluator:
"""
Minimal Evaluator for demonstration purposes.
"""
def __init__(self, adapter):
self.adapter = adapter
def evaluate(self, prompt):
output = self.adapter.generate(prompt)
# For demonstration, score is always 1.0
score = 1.0
return Result(output, score)

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
"""

from agentunit.core.evaluator import Evaluator
from agentunit.core.adapters import BaseAdapter
Copy link

Copilot AI Dec 8, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The import path agentunit.core.adapters does not exist in the codebase. The BaseAdapter class is located at agentunit.adapters.base, not agentunit.core.adapters. This should be from agentunit.adapters.base import BaseAdapter.

Suggested change
from agentunit.core.adapters import BaseAdapter
from agentunit.adapters.base import BaseAdapter

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Comment on lines 12 to 19


class FakeAdapter(BaseAdapter):
"""
A simple mock adapter used only for demonstration.
It returns a predictable output so evaluation is easy to understand.
"""

Copy link

Copilot AI Dec 8, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The FakeAdapter class does not properly implement the BaseAdapter interface. BaseAdapter requires abstract methods prepare() and execute(case: DatasetCase, trace: TraceLog) -> AdapterOutcome, but this implementation only has a generate(prompt: str) -> str method. This will cause a TypeError when attempting to instantiate FakeAdapter because abstract methods are not implemented.

Suggested change
class FakeAdapter(BaseAdapter):
"""
A simple mock adapter used only for demonstration.
It returns a predictable output so evaluation is easy to understand.
"""
from agentunit.core.schema import DatasetCase, TraceLog, AdapterOutcome
class FakeAdapter(BaseAdapter):
"""
A simple mock adapter used only for demonstration.
It returns a predictable output so evaluation is easy to understand.
"""
def prepare(self):
# No preparation needed for the fake adapter
pass
def execute(self, case: DatasetCase, trace: TraceLog) -> AdapterOutcome:
# Use the generate method to produce a response
output = self.generate(case.prompt)
# Return a minimal AdapterOutcome object
return AdapterOutcome(output=output)

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Comment on lines 29 to 36
# Step 2 — Create the evaluator
evaluator = Evaluator(adapter=adapter)

# Step 3 — Prepare an example prompt
prompt = "Say hello!"

# Step 4 — Run the evaluation
result = evaluator.evaluate(prompt)
Copy link

Copilot AI Dec 8, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The Evaluator class and its evaluate method do not exist in the codebase. The example attempts to use an API that is not implemented, which will fail at runtime. The actual evaluation flow in AgentUnit uses Scenario objects with adapters and runners, not an Evaluator class.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Comment on lines 38 to 41
# Step 5 — Print the output
print("Prompt:", prompt)
print("Model Output:", result.output)
print("Evaluation Score:", result.score)
Copy link

Copilot AI Dec 8, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The result object is assumed to have .output and .score attributes, but since the Evaluator class doesn't exist, the expected return type and its interface are unknown. This code will fail at runtime.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Copy link
Owner

@aviralgarg05 aviralgarg05 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fix the issues

@Jagriti-student
Copy link
Contributor Author

I have fix the issue.

Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 7 out of 7 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.


💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment on lines 29 to 41
# Step 2 — Create the evaluator
evaluator = Evaluator(adapter=adapter)

# Step 3 — Prepare an example prompt
prompt = "Say hello!"

# Step 4 — Run the evaluation
result = evaluator.evaluate(prompt)

# Step 5 — Print the output
print("Prompt:", prompt)
print("Model Output:", result.output)
print("Evaluation Score:", result.score)
Copy link

Copilot AI Dec 9, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The Evaluator API pattern used here doesn't match the actual AgentUnit API. The real API uses Runner with Scenario objects that wrap adapters. The Evaluator class doesn't exist, and Runner.run() returns a SuiteResult, not a result with .output and .score attributes as shown here.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Comment on lines 12 to 22


class FakeAdapter(BaseAdapter):
"""
A simple mock adapter used only for demonstration.
It returns a predictable output so evaluation is easy to understand.
"""

def generate(self, prompt: str) -> str:
# Always returns the same answer for simplicity
return "Hello, this is a fake response!"
Copy link

Copilot AI Dec 9, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

BaseAdapter does not have a generate method. The abstract base class requires implementing prepare() and execute(case: DatasetCase, trace: TraceLog) -> AdapterOutcome methods. The execute method should accept a DatasetCase and TraceLog, not a simple string prompt.

Suggested change
class FakeAdapter(BaseAdapter):
"""
A simple mock adapter used only for demonstration.
It returns a predictable output so evaluation is easy to understand.
"""
def generate(self, prompt: str) -> str:
# Always returns the same answer for simplicity
return "Hello, this is a fake response!"
from agentunit.core.dataset import DatasetCase
from agentunit.core.trace import TraceLog
from agentunit.core.adapters import AdapterOutcome
class FakeAdapter(BaseAdapter):
"""
A simple mock adapter used only for demonstration.
It returns a predictable output so evaluation is easy to understand.
"""
def prepare(self):
# No preparation needed for the fake adapter
pass
def execute(self, case: DatasetCase, trace: TraceLog) -> AdapterOutcome:
# Always returns the same answer for simplicity
response = "Hello, this is a fake response!"
return AdapterOutcome(output=response)

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Signed-off-by: Jagriti-student <jagriti7989@gmail.com>
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 17, 2025

Note

Other AI code review bot(s) detected

CodeRabbit has detected other AI code review bot(s) in this pull request and will avoid duplicating their findings in the review comments. This may lead to a less comprehensive review.

Walkthrough

A new FakeAdapter class is added to the examples module, extending BaseAdapter with a simple generate method that returns a fixed response for demonstration purposes.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
New adapter class
examples/basic_evaluation.py
Added FakeAdapter class inheriting from BaseAdapter with a generate(prompt: str) -> str method returning a fixed response.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (3 warnings, 1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title check ⚠️ Warning The PR title 'Fix typos in docstrings' is directly related to the main changes, but the actual code changes show a new FakeAdapter class being added, which is unrelated to fixing typos in docstrings. Update the PR title to reflect the actual changes (e.g., 'Add FakeAdapter class to examples') or ensure the code changes align with the stated objective of fixing docstring typos.
Linked Issues check ⚠️ Warning The PR claims to fix typos in docstrings per issue #8, but the raw summary shows only the addition of a FakeAdapter class with no docstring corrections, which contradicts the stated objective. Either implement the actual docstring typo fixes from issue #8 (search and correct common typos in src/agentunit/core/) or update the linked issue if the PR scope has changed.
Out of Scope Changes check ⚠️ Warning The addition of FakeAdapter class in examples/basic_evaluation.py appears to be out of scope relative to issue #8, which explicitly requires fixing typos in docstrings within src/agentunit/core/. Remove the FakeAdapter class changes if they are unrelated to the docstring typo fixes, or clarify why this addition is necessary for the PR's stated objective.
Description check ❓ Inconclusive The description is minimal and does not follow the repository's comprehensive template. It lacks sections for Type of Change, Testing, Code Quality checks, and other required documentation elements. Fill out the complete PR description template with all required sections including Type of Change, Testing details, Code Quality checklist, and other relevant sections.
✅ Passed checks (1 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between fcd78c8 and 93af01a.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • examples/basic_evaluation.py (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
  • GitHub Check: Test (Python 3.10)
  • GitHub Check: Test (Python 3.12)

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

⚠️ Please install the 'codecov app svg image' to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Caution

Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.

⚠️ Outside diff range comments (4)
examples/basic_evaluation.py (4)

1-46: PR description doesn't match the actual changes.

The PR is titled "Fix typos in docstrings" and claims to fix spelling mistakes, but this file introduces an entirely new example with a FakeAdapter class. Additionally, multiple past review comments have flagged critical issues with imports and API usage that remain unaddressed.


26-42: Example may not work with actual AgentUnit API.

Past review comments indicate that the Evaluator class doesn't exist in the codebase, and that the actual AgentUnit API uses Runner with Scenario objects rather than the pattern shown here. If correct, this example will fail at runtime.

Since this is an example file meant to demonstrate AgentUnit usage, it's critical that it actually works. Please verify the correct API pattern and update the example accordingly.


10-11: Fix incorrect import paths and undefined class.

Line 10: BaseAdapter is located at agentunit.adapters.base, not agentunit.core.adapters. Change to from agentunit.adapters.base import BaseAdapter.

Line 11: No Evaluator class exists in the codebase at agentunit.core.evaluator. This import will fail at runtime. The class definition does not exist and needs to be implemented or replaced with an existing evaluation class.


15-23: FakeAdapter is missing required abstract method implementations from BaseAdapter.

FakeAdapter only implements generate(prompt: str), but BaseAdapter requires implementing prepare() -> None and execute(case: DatasetCase, trace: TraceLog) -> AdapterOutcome. The code will raise TypeError: Can't instantiate abstract class FakeAdapter with abstract methods prepare, execute when line 28 executes.

Add both methods to FakeAdapter with minimal implementations:

  • prepare(): can be a pass statement or minimal setup
  • execute(): should return an AdapterOutcome based on the provided case and trace
📜 Review details

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between fcd78c8 and 93af01a.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • examples/basic_evaluation.py (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
  • GitHub Check: Test (Python 3.10)
  • GitHub Check: Test (Python 3.12)

@Jagriti-student
Copy link
Contributor Author

I have solve the issue.

Copy link
Owner

@aviralgarg05 aviralgarg05 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@aviralgarg05 aviralgarg05 merged commit 1db98a6 into aviralgarg05:main Jan 4, 2026
12 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Fix typos in docstrings

3 participants