Skip to content

Conversation

@andrii-a8c
Copy link
Collaborator

Description

Describe the changes or additions included in this PR.

Test plan

How did you test the new or updated feature?


Release notes

Check each box that your changes affect. If none of the boxes relate to your changes, release notes aren't required.

For each box you select, include information after the relevant heading that describes the impact of your changes that a user might notice and any actions they must take to implement updates.

  • Protocol:
  • Nodes (Validators and Full nodes):
  • gRPC:
  • JSON-RPC:
  • GraphQL:
  • CLI:
  • Rust SDK:

@andrii-a8c
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@andreistefanescu .to_int() is still working with preferred local deps because we are basically in our sui repo

@andrii-a8c andrii-a8c assigned andrii-a8c and unassigned cos Aug 20, 2025
Copy link

@andreistefanescu andreistefanescu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

let's merge only the rust changes in next, and sync with @msaaltink regarding merging the move changes back in his branch.

@andrii-a8c
Copy link
Collaborator Author

#82 rust part merge separetly

@andrii-a8c andrii-a8c force-pushed the sui-system-cherry-pick branch from 8d4dc8a to 0fb0e07 Compare September 25, 2025 12:36
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think sender_spec and epoch_spec are needed any more with the latest prover


// === specs utils ===

#[spec_only]
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should be test_only

#[spec_only]
use sui_system::staking_pool::activation_epoch;

#[spec_only]
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should be test_only here, and at line 101

Copy link
Collaborator

@msaaltink msaaltink left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Mostly this looks fine. As noted a few spec_only should probably be test_only, and I think the "other_specs" are not needed with the latest prover versions.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants