-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
Deal with Storage Manager tech debt #12321
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ public ApiCommandResourceType getApiResourceType() { | |
| return ApiCommandResourceType.StoragePool; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| public Map<String,String> getDetails() { | ||
| public Map<String,Object> getDetails() { | ||
|
||
| return details; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The removed attribute "requestHasSensitiveInfo = true" from the APICommand annotation indicates that this command was previously marked as containing sensitive information (access keys, secret keys). Removing this flag could have security implications if there's any downstream processing that relies on this metadata to handle sensitive data appropriately. Verify that this removal is intentional and that sensitive parameter handling is maintained through other means.