fix: NsxResource.executeRequest DeleteNsxNatRuleCommand comparison bug

[wolfchkov]

Description

Fixes an issue in NsxResource.executeRequest where Network.Service comparison failed when DeleteNsxNatRuleCommand was executed in a different process. Due to serialization/deserialization, the deserialized Network.Service instance was not equal to the static instances Network.Service.StaticNat and Network.Service.PortForwarding, causing the comparison to always return false.

Types of changes

• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
• Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)
• Build/CI
• Test (unit or integration test code)

Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity

Feature/Enhancement Scale

• Major
• Minor

Bug Severity

• BLOCKER
• Critical
• Major
• Minor
• Trivial

Screenshots (if appropriate):

How Has This Been Tested?

Rewrite unit test to check this bug.

How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?

[DaanHoogland]

clgtm, tnx @wolfchkov

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 3.58%. Comparing base (5bf869c) to head (57129ff).

❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (5bf869c) and HEAD (57129ff). Click for more details.

HEAD has 1 upload less than BASE

Flag	BASE (5bf869c)	HEAD (57129ff)
unittests	1	0

Additional details and impacted files

@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##               main   #12311       +/-   ##
=============================================
- Coverage     17.51%    3.58%   -13.93%     
=============================================
  Files          5914      445     -5469     
  Lines        529867    37618   -492249     
  Branches      64722     6941    -57781     
=============================================
- Hits          92782     1347    -91435     
+ Misses       426635    36105   -390530     
+ Partials      10450      166    -10284     

Flag	Coverage Δ
uitests	3.58% <ø> (ø)
unittests	?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.