Skip to content

Conversation

@tonypioneer
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull Request Details

What issue does this PR address

  • Fixed the issue that uploaded file appears in the unexpected directory.

Associated Issue

Type of Change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • This change requires a documentation update

How Has This Been Tested?

Build and run the app, and then upload some files on Files page.

Checklist

Complete the check-list below to ensure your branch is ready for PR.

  • Screenshots included in linked issue SOLID UI: Uploaded file appears in unexpected directory #193
  • Changes adhere to the style and coding guidelines
  • I have performed a self-review of my code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules
  • The update contains no confidential information
  • The update has no duplicated content
  • No lint check errors are related to these changes (make prep or flutter analyze lib)
  • Integration test dart test output or screenshot included in issue #
  • I tested the PR on these devices:
    • Android
    • iOS
    • Linux
    • MacOS
    • Windows
    • Web
  • I have identified reviewers
  • The PR has been approved by reviewers

Finalising

Once PR discussion is complete and reviewers have approved:

  • Merge dev into the this branch
  • Resolve any conflicts
  • Add a one line summary into the CHANGELOG.md
  • Push to the git repository and review
  • Merge the PR into dev

@tonypioneer tonypioneer requested a review from cdawei February 5, 2026 10:56
@tonypioneer tonypioneer linked an issue Feb 5, 2026 that may be closed by this pull request
8 tasks
Copy link
Contributor

@cdawei cdawei left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I suggest we hold this PR as the issue will probably be resolved automatically once #153 is fixed?

@tonypioneer
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I suggest we hold this PR as the issue will probably be resolved automatically once #153 is fixed?

Hi @cdawei, I'm not very sure about that because PR for issue #153 is based on the PR for this issue. #153 contains the fixing for this issue as well.

@cdawei
Copy link
Contributor

cdawei commented Feb 6, 2026

Hi @cdawei, I'm not very sure about that because PR for issue #153 is based on the PR for this issue. #153 contains the fixing for this issue as well.

Shall we change the merge target of PR #198 to branch dev so that when the PR for #153 is merged, it will also include the fix for this issue? (As the root cause of this issue is very likely #153.)

@tonypioneer
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Hi @cdawei, I'm not very sure about that because PR for issue #153 is based on the PR for this issue. #153 contains the fixing for this issue as well.

Shall we change the merge target of PR #198 to branch dev so that when the PR for #153 is merged, it will also include the fix for this issue? (As the root cause of this issue is very likely #153.)

I think if we change the merge target to dev, it will also contain the code changes in this PR. Because I created the branch for #153 based on the branch for #193, and all the changes are also based on the code in #193. So after we merge #153 to dev, there will be no file changes in #193, and we can directly close this PR.

@cdawei
Copy link
Contributor

cdawei commented Feb 6, 2026

I think if we change the merge target to dev, it will also contain the code changes in this PR. Because I created the branch for #153 based on the branch for #193, and all the changes are also based on the code in #193. So after we merge #153 to dev, there will be no file changes in #193, and we can directly close this PR.

This is exactly what I would like to suggest, sorry for not being clear in previous comments.

@tonypioneer
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I think if we change the merge target to dev, it will also contain the code changes in this PR. Because I created the branch for #153 based on the branch for #193, and all the changes are also based on the code in #193. So after we merge #153 to dev, there will be no file changes in #193, and we can directly close this PR.

This is exactly what I would like to suggest, sorry for not being clear in previous comments.

No worries. I've changed the merge target to dev. Thanks @cdawei for the clarification.

@cdawei
Copy link
Contributor

cdawei commented Feb 6, 2026

Feel free to close this PR as issue #193 will be resolved in PR #198.

@tonypioneer
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Close as this issue will be resolved in PR #198.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants