fix: [AAP-37813] Replace EDA filters with DAB rest filters

[Dostonbek1]

This PR replaces our existing filters with rest-filters app that DAB provides, which is more capable and helps us align across platform.

AAP-37813

e2e tests workflow with updated tests and api client

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 94.03%. Comparing base (15a8dae) to head (166a189).

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1234      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   94.11%   94.03%   -0.09%     
==========================================
  Files         318      307      -11     
  Lines       18651    18523     -128     
==========================================
- Hits        17554    17418     -136     
- Misses       1097     1105       +8     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unit-int-tests-3.11	93.97% <100.00%> (-0.09%)	⬇️
unit-int-tests-3.12	94.03% <100.00%> (-0.09%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
src/aap_eda/api/views/activation.py	97.57% <100.00%> (-0.05%)	⬇️
src/aap_eda/api/views/credential_type.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/aap_eda/api/views/decision_environment.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/aap_eda/api/views/eda_credential.py	91.81% <100.00%> (-7.29%)	⬇️
src/aap_eda/api/views/event_stream.py	89.79% <100.00%> (-0.21%)	⬇️
src/aap_eda/api/views/organization.py	79.48% <100.00%> (-1.01%)	⬇️
src/aap_eda/api/views/project.py	96.80% <100.00%> (-0.07%)	⬇️
src/aap_eda/api/views/rulebook.py	97.46% <100.00%> (-0.10%)	⬇️
src/aap_eda/api/views/team.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/aap_eda/api/views/user.py	97.14% <100.00%> (-0.08%)	⬇️
... and 11 more

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[Dostonbek1]

e2e test run with updated api client: https://github.com/ansible/eda-server/actions/runs/13793345570

[Dostonbek1]

@lgalis this might be a breaking change for the UI depending on how it is using the current EDA filters. Could you help us confirm?

[Alex-Izquierdo]

@Dostonbek1 should we put it as draft until have confirmation it will not break the UI, just to prevent accidental merges?

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[mkanoor]

@Dostonbek1 this looks good but we need to ensure that it works with @lgalis's UI components. Plus she would have to make changes to take advantage of the new filters which can be combined which wasn't allowed earlier. Would it be possible to build a quay.io image for UI testing

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud