add a separate scope to URL protocol and www #732
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
eugenesvk
changed the title
eugenesvk
force-pushed
the
url_protocol
branch
from
6e77009 to
276c45c
Compare
eugenesvk
force-pushed
the
url_protocol
branch
from
276c45c to
9b73edd
Compare
deathaxe
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 29, 2025
deathaxe
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 29, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I wanted to deemphasize protocol highlighting in links (
http) as well as the usually optionalwww., so added separate scopes to themSyntax tests failed locally before my edits, and the number of failed tests didn't change
(btw, got confused by https://github.com/SublimeText-Markdown/MarkdownEditing/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md again, if there are no milestones, would you please update the doc to reflect whatever actual scheme you're maintaining in this repo?)