Open
Conversation
Owner
|
This is a prototype system for functionality that will required in the base mod when sculk sensors are added. The end goal is to add cross compatibility between it and fluidlogged, but it needs to be required in the base mod. |
Author
|
If that's the case, perhaps you should consider adding Fluidlogged API as a required dependency? Doing so would definitely simplify things down the line. After all, the whole point of Fluidlogged API is to serve as a library for other mods to use 😄 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Add an optional Fluidlogged API dependency, instead of re-implementing fluidlogging logic from scratch.
Pros:
Cons: