CASE STUDY ON TERRAVISION
This repository contains a comprehensive case study of the intellectual property (IPR) dispute between ART+COM (Terravision) and Google (Google Earth).
- Case Name: ART+COM Innovationpool GmbH vs Google LLC
- Patent in Dispute: U.S. Patent RE44,550, titled βMethod and Device for Pictorial Representation of Space-Related Dataβ :contentReference[oaicite:0]{index=0}
- Claim: ART+COM alleged Google Earth infringed on their patented Terravision technology. :contentReference[oaicite:1]{index=1}
- Result: Jury verdict in May 2016 found for Google (non-infringement + patent invalidity). :contentReference[oaicite:2]{index=2}
- Appeal: The Court of Appeals (Federal Circuit) affirmed that SRIβs earlier TerraVision was prior art, invalidating ART+COMβs patent. :contentReference[oaicite:3]{index=3}
slides/β Presentation slides (PowerPoint / PDF) for the case studydocs/β Supporting legal documents, patent text, and researchimages/β Diagrams, comparison images, timeline visualizationsrc/β (Optional) scripts to generate visuals (e.g., timeline)LICENSEβ Licensing for usage of this repository content
- Google Earth (Wikipedia) β background on Google Earth :contentReference[oaicite:4]{index=4}
- Terravision (Wikipedia) β details about ART+COMβs system :contentReference[oaicite:5]{index=5}
- Court Opinion (Justia) β detailed appellate judgment :contentReference[oaicite:6]{index=6}
- ART+COM v. Google β Original Complaint (PDF) β lawsuit filed in 2014 :contentReference[oaicite:7]{index=7}
- Law360 / IP Watchdog coverage β analysis of the appeal outcome :contentReference[oaicite:8]{index=8}
- News report on the lawsuit by Livemint :contentReference[oaicite:9]{index=9}
-
Patent Law Concepts
- Prior art
- Public use
- Patent invalidation
-
Technical Innovation
- 3D Earth visualization
- Multi-resolution imagery (pyramids)
- Client-server streaming architecture
-
Business & Strategy
- Licensing negotiations (Googleβs 2006 offer) :contentReference[oaicite:10]{index=10}
- Why ART+COMβs patent strategy failed
-
IPR Lessons
- Importance of documenting and citing prior systems
- How public domain research can invalidate later patents
- Challenges of protecting software-based innovations
- πΌ For Students / Researchers: Use the slides and docs to prepare a case study or presentation.
- π For Developers / Designers: Use the timeline scripts to make visual tools that help explain the case flow.
Contributions are welcome! Feel free to:
- Add more diagrams or visuals
- Create alternative timelines
- Summarize key arguments from the judgment
- Improve or translate the README into other languages
