Implement Model Factory

[ab-10]

No description provided.

[recurseml]

Redundant comment that just states what the code itself makes clear via the TypeVar declaration. The comment adds no additional context or explanation beyond what is immediately apparent from the code.

📚 Relevant Docs

_{🔍 This comment matches your effective_comments.mdc rule.}

Suggested change

# Type variables for our factory system

---

React with 👍 to tell me that this comment was useful, or 👎 if not (and I'll stop posting more comments like this in the future)

[recurseml]

Comment restates what is obvious from the variable names and initialization pattern. The fact that these are caches for generated models is clear from the '_model' suffix and None initialization. The comment adds no extra insight.

📚 Relevant Docs

_{🔍 This comment matches your effective_comments.mdc rule.}

---

React with 👍 to tell me that this comment was useful, or 👎 if not (and I'll stop posting more comments like this in the future)

[recurseml]

Redundant comment that simply labels the next block of code without adding any valuable context. The code itself clearly shows that standard field constraints are being applied through self-documenting variable names.

📚 Relevant Docs

_{🔍 This comment matches your effective_comments.mdc rule.}

---

React with 👍 to tell me that this comment was useful, or 👎 if not (and I'll stop posting more comments like this in the future)

[recurseml]

Premature abstraction introducing a complex factory pattern that couples behaviors which may need to evolve separately. The factory system enforces a rigid CRUD pattern across all models, making it difficult to handle domain-specific variations in validation rules, update patterns, and business constraints. According to the anti-DRY principle, this abstraction should wait until clear common patterns emerge that justify the coupling.

📚 Relevant Docs

_{🔍 This comment matches your anti_dry.mdc rule.}

Suggested change

	setup_model_factories()
	class UserBase(SQLModel):
	email: EmailStr = Field(unique=True, index=True, max_length=255)
	is_active: bool = True
	is_superuser: bool = False
	full_name: str | None = Field(default=None, max_length=255)

---

React with 👍 to tell me that this comment was useful, or 👎 if not (and I'll stop posting more comments like this in the future)

[recurseml]

Redundant comment that simply restates what is already obvious from the code and variable names. The comment adds no additional context or explanation of why the factory pattern is used, violating the principle that comments should explain why, not what.

📚 Relevant Docs

_{🔍 This comment matches your effective_comments.mdc rule.}

---

React with 👍 to tell me that this comment was useful, or 👎 if not (and I'll stop posting more comments like this in the future)

[recurseml]

Redundant comment that merely restates what is clear from the variable names and code structure. Comments should not state the obvious but rather provide insight into non-obvious aspects of the code.

📚 Relevant Docs

_{🔍 This comment matches your effective_comments.mdc rule.}

---

React with 👍 to tell me that this comment was useful, or 👎 if not (and I'll stop posting more comments like this in the future)

[recurseml]

Redundant comment that provides no additional context beyond what's already clear from the code structure and naming. The fact that these models don't use the factory pattern is evident from the code itself.

📚 Relevant Docs

_{🔍 This comment matches your effective_comments.mdc rule.}

---

React with 👍 to tell me that this comment was useful, or 👎 if not (and I'll stop posting more comments like this in the future)

[recurseml]

😱 Found 8 issues. Time to roll up your sleeves! 😱

^{Need help? Join our Discord for support!
https://discord.gg/NCpkJ4kF}