⚡ Optimize sendMessage by removing unnecessary await#7
⚡ Optimize sendMessage by removing unnecessary await#7
Conversation
Co-authored-by: PixelMelt <44953835+PixelMelt@users.noreply.github.com>
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
💡 What:
Removed the
awaitkeyword fromthis.socket.emit(eventId, data);in thesendMessagemethod ofsrc/bot.js.🎯 Why:
The
socket.io-clientv2 library'semitmethod is synchronous and does not return a Promise. Awaiting it is unnecessary and introduces a small performance overhead due to the creation of a resolved Promise and microtask scheduling.📊 Measured Improvement:
A synthetic benchmark (
benchmark_await.js) simulating thesendMessagelogic showed a significant reduction in execution time for high-frequency calls.Note: While the real-world impact on the bot's overall performance depends on network latency and event frequency, this change removes unnecessary CPU cycles and microtask scheduling, making the code cleaner and slightly more efficient.
Verified functionality with
test_reproduction.jswhich mocks the socket and ensuresemitis still called correctly.PR created automatically by Jules for task 16524161166967470376 started by @PixelMelt